2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.108665
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stereotactic 9-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy, how many specimens are needed?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Herein, we reported a higher number of specimens with nearly 15 per lesion in comparison to the literature (13). This result might be accredited to the fact that domestic patients are more inclined to have more tissue removed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Herein, we reported a higher number of specimens with nearly 15 per lesion in comparison to the literature (13). This result might be accredited to the fact that domestic patients are more inclined to have more tissue removed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…In our cohort, we used 8 G for VAEs and 11 G for VABs. den Dekker et al found that six 9 G VAB specimens are enough to reach a final histopathological diagnosis in 95% of cases [12]. In our practice, we always aim to take 12 specimens for VAB and between 12-20 specimens for VAE to achieve complete excision.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In VAB, the number of specimens to be collected will be directly proportional to the size of the lesion. Dekker et al ( 1 ) suggested the following: obtain six specimens with a 9G needle, from the lesion and from the periphery, in order to have 95% accuracy in the final diagnosis. In VAE, oblique aspiration should be avoided; rather, the lesion should be removed orthogonally, in order to obtain the largest possible specimen, which is an important factor in determining the number of atypical features in the lesion, given that the histological criterion to differentiate atypical ductal hyperplasia from ductal carcinoma in situ is quantitative and has the aim of reducing the rate of diagnostic underestimation.…”
Section: Technical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then, VAE has been ever more widely used in clinical practice. The greater acceptance and broader availability, together with the use of larger caliber needles, has allowed the removal of a larger amount of sample, substantially reducing the rate of diagnostic underestimation and thus increasing the reliability of the results of the procedure ( 1 ) . This results in potential surgical de-escalation, reducing the extent of the surgical intervention in selected cases, and gains strength in a scenario in which the aim is to reduce costs, as well as the rates of underestimation and overtreatment, without compromising the quality of patient care.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%