Background
Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for localized prostate cancer has potential advantages over traditional radiotherapies. We compared national trends in utilization, complications, and costs of SBRT to traditional radiotherapies.
Methods
We identified men who underwent SBRT, intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), brachytherapy, and proton beam therapy as primary treatment for prostate cancer during 2004 and 2011 from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER)-Medicare linked data. Temporal trend of therapy utilization was assessed using Cochran-Armitage test. Two-year outcomes were compared using chi-square test. Median treatment costs were compared using Kruskal Wallis test.
Results
542 men received SBRT, 9,647 brachytherapy, 23,408 IMRT and 800 proton beam therapy. There was significant increase in SBRT and proton beam utilization (p<0.001), whereas brachytherapy utilization decreased (p<0.001). A higher proportion of SBRT and brachytherapy subjects had low grade (Gleason≤6 vs. ≥7) cancer compared to IMRT and proton therapy (54.0%, 64.2% vs 35.2%, 49.6%, respectively; p<0.001). SBRT compared to brachytherapy and IMRT was associated with equivalent gastrointestinal toxicity but more erectile dysfunction at two-year follow-up (p<0.001). SBRT was associated with more urinary incontinence compared to IMRT and proton therapy but less compared to brachytherapy (p<0.001, respectively). Median cost of SBRT was $27,145 compared to $17,183 for brachytherapy, $37,090 for IMRT and $54,706 for proton beam therapy (p<0.001).
Conclusions
Utilization of SBRT and proton therapy for localized prostate cancer has increased over time. Despite men of lower stage undergoing SBRT, SBRT was associated with greater toxicity but lower healthcare costs compared to IMRT and proton therapy.