2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00432-020-03389-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stereotactic body radiotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma: patient selection and predictors of outcome and toxicity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“… No UVA or MVA; no planned therapy/TACE Yeung et al 35 2019; retrospective 31 Median size=3.3 cm (1.3–5 cm) 45 Gy/3-5# 1-year LC= 94% 1-yr OS=84% 19% worsened CP score by>2 points; 32% > Grade 3 toxicities Child-Pugh Class A or B, with small HCCs measuring ≤5 cm; On UVA, small tumour size predicted for improved overall survival (P = 0.01); no planned therapy/TACE Mathew et al 28 2020; retrospective 297; ineligible or recurrent/residual after RFA/TACE; CP A/B/C=76/20/2 Median size=2.7cm (0.5–18.1cm) 27–60 Gy/3-6# 3-yr LRR=13% 3-yr OS= 39% Worsening of CP score by ≥2 points three months after SBRT in 16%. Liver transplant after downstaging post SBRT in 25 patients, CP A liver function, AFP ≤ 10 ng/mL, and ECOG status 0 significantly improved OS; no planned TACE Kimura et al 31 2020; prospective 36 (target 60; closed early due to poor accrual) Median size=2.3 cm (1–5 cm) 40 Gy/5# 3-yr LC= 90% 3-yr OS=78% ≥Grade 3 toxicities= 11% Previously untreated solitary HCC Loi et al 32 2020; retrospective 128 (BCLC Class A/B=31%/56%) Median size= 3 cm (1.4–9.9 cm) Median BED 10 =103 Gy/3-10#; Range=30–75 Gy in 3–10 # 2-yr LC= 78% 2-yr OS=58% (whole cohort; separately NA) Acute Grade 3 Toxicity- acute liver failure and ascites in 1 pt. In BCLC stage A-B disease (n=112), LC associated with improved OS (median 30 months vs not reached, p=0.036) Park et al 36 2020; retrospective 290 (BCLC Class A=86%) Median size=1.7 cm Median 45 Gy in 3 −4# (Range 30–60 Gy/3-4 #) …”
Section: Evidence For Indications and Efficacy Of Sbrt In Early Hccmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… No UVA or MVA; no planned therapy/TACE Yeung et al 35 2019; retrospective 31 Median size=3.3 cm (1.3–5 cm) 45 Gy/3-5# 1-year LC= 94% 1-yr OS=84% 19% worsened CP score by>2 points; 32% > Grade 3 toxicities Child-Pugh Class A or B, with small HCCs measuring ≤5 cm; On UVA, small tumour size predicted for improved overall survival (P = 0.01); no planned therapy/TACE Mathew et al 28 2020; retrospective 297; ineligible or recurrent/residual after RFA/TACE; CP A/B/C=76/20/2 Median size=2.7cm (0.5–18.1cm) 27–60 Gy/3-6# 3-yr LRR=13% 3-yr OS= 39% Worsening of CP score by ≥2 points three months after SBRT in 16%. Liver transplant after downstaging post SBRT in 25 patients, CP A liver function, AFP ≤ 10 ng/mL, and ECOG status 0 significantly improved OS; no planned TACE Kimura et al 31 2020; prospective 36 (target 60; closed early due to poor accrual) Median size=2.3 cm (1–5 cm) 40 Gy/5# 3-yr LC= 90% 3-yr OS=78% ≥Grade 3 toxicities= 11% Previously untreated solitary HCC Loi et al 32 2020; retrospective 128 (BCLC Class A/B=31%/56%) Median size= 3 cm (1.4–9.9 cm) Median BED 10 =103 Gy/3-10#; Range=30–75 Gy in 3–10 # 2-yr LC= 78% 2-yr OS=58% (whole cohort; separately NA) Acute Grade 3 Toxicity- acute liver failure and ascites in 1 pt. In BCLC stage A-B disease (n=112), LC associated with improved OS (median 30 months vs not reached, p=0.036) Park et al 36 2020; retrospective 290 (BCLC Class A=86%) Median size=1.7 cm Median 45 Gy in 3 −4# (Range 30–60 Gy/3-4 #) …”
Section: Evidence For Indications and Efficacy Of Sbrt In Early Hccmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent multi-institutional series from these countries though report outcomes of patients who were treated with SBRT upfront as first line of treatment, indicating a more widespread adoption/acceptance of SBRT in treatment of early tumors. [30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37]…”
Section: Definitive Treatment Of Early Hccmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HCC is a radiosensitive tumour, and the presence of a significant dose response effect within the range of reported SABR dosing schedules has not been consistently demonstrated. [22][23][24] Local control rates for earlystage disease are generally high, more advanced disease is likely to receive lower doses, and patients often have significant competing risks for mortality including out-offield recurrences and progression of underlying liver disease. Thus, in comparison to SABR for other indications, more conservative dosing is often applied in the setting of HCC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is easy to spread in the liver through the portal vein system to form intrahepatic metastasis, and it is also easy to form tumor thrombus in the portal vein and cause portal hypertension. HCC is mostly found in the middle and late stages, which leads to its generally poor prognosis (4)(5)(6)(7)(8). According to statistics, the recurrence rate of HCC after surgery is as high as about 70% (9), and the survival rate is only 15%-40% (10).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%