2019
DOI: 10.1007/s13566-019-00395-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stereotactic body radiotherapy versus conventional radiotherapy for early-stage small cell lung cancer

Abstract: Purpose: This study was designed to compare survival outcomes for non-surgically managed T1-T2N0M0 small cell lung cancer (SCLC) who received either stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) or conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (CFRT) using the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB). Methods: The was queried between 2004-2015 for patients with T1-T2N0M0 SCLC. Patients must have been treated with curative intent SBRT or CFRT (delivered daily or twice daily, 45-70 Gy) with or without chemotherapy. The primary … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been demonstrated to provide survival benefits superior to conventional fractionated radiotherapy, especially for elderly oligometastatic patients. [8][9][10] There are some reports demonstrates that SBRT might be safe and effective for soft tissue sarcoma. [11][12][13] Huang et al reported a case of an octogenarian with PC treated with SBRT, at a dose of 60 Gy in eight fractions (7.5 Gy per fraction).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been demonstrated to provide survival benefits superior to conventional fractionated radiotherapy, especially for elderly oligometastatic patients. [8][9][10] There are some reports demonstrates that SBRT might be safe and effective for soft tissue sarcoma. [11][12][13] Huang et al reported a case of an octogenarian with PC treated with SBRT, at a dose of 60 Gy in eight fractions (7.5 Gy per fraction).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SBRT has become an effective treatment modality for medically or surgically inoperable lung cancer, and in one study, it has proven to provide superior survival benefit to the conventional fractionated radiotherapy. 8 Over the past decade, more clinicians have become aware of SBRT and have begun using it more often to treat early-stage lung cancer in both medically inoperable and operable patients. 9,10 It has also been used to treat much older patients (>80 years old) with high efficacy and tolerable toxicities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SBRT was significantly associated with improved survival when CT was given (P<0.001).On multivariate analysis in the CT group, adjusting for sex, age, and tumor size, the use of SBRT trended to improve survival (P=0.06). SBRT was strongly associated with a survival benefit in elderly patients [121].…”
Section: Sbrt For Early Es-sclcmentioning
confidence: 96%