Stereotactic breast biopsy with a biopsy gun.

Jaeger, H J; Kruegener, G H; Macfie, Jefferys A.; Glaves, I

doi:10.1148/radiology.179.2.2014319

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Indicated AGD metric must be within ± 25% of measured dose. 30,31 Stereotactic/Tomosynthesisguided breast biopsy systems 32 kVp accuracy and reproducibility 32,33 To assure that the actual kVp is accurate to within ± 5% of the indicated kVp and that the kVp is reproducible as indicated by a coefficient of variation less than or equal to 0.02. (Continues)…”

Section: Mammographic Equipment 30mentioning

confidence: 99%

Quality management, quality assurance, and quality control in medical physics

Amurao

Gress

Keenan

et al. 2023

J Applied Clin Med Phys

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The historic and ongoing evolution of the practice, technology, terminology, and implementation of programs related to quality in the medical radiological professions has given rise to the interchangeable use of the terms Quality Management (QM), Quality Assurance (QA), and Quality Control (QC) in the vernacular. This White Paper aims to provide clarification of QM, QA, and QC in medical physics context and guidance on how to use these terms appropriately in American College of Radiology (ACR) Practice Parameters and Technical Standards, generalizable to other guidance initiatives. The clarification of these nuanced terms in the radiology, radiation oncology, and nuclear medicine environments will not only boost the comprehensibility and usability of the Medical Physics Technical Standards and Practice Parameters, but also provide clarity and a foundation for ACR's clinical, physician‐led Practice Parameters, which also use these important terms for monitoring equipment performance for safety and quality. Further, this will support the ongoing development of the professional practice of clinical medical physics by providing a common framework that distinguishes the various types of responsibilities borne by medical physicists and others in the medical radiological environment. Examples are provided of how QM, QA, and QC may be applied in the context of ACR Practice Parameters and Technical Standards.

show abstract

Section: Mammographic Equipment 30mentioning

confidence: 99%