2018
DOI: 10.1111/jvim.15212
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stereotactic radiation therapy for the treatment of functional pituitary adenomas associated with feline acromegaly

Abstract: BackgroundConventional fractionated radiotherapy has been shown to be partially effective for management of pituitary tumors in cats that cause acromegaly and diabetes mellitus (DM), but, the efficacy and safety of stereotactic radiation therapy (SRT) as a treatment for acromegalic cats has not been described.HypothesisStereotactic radiation therapy is an effective and safe treatment for controlling acromegaly associated with pituitary adenomas in cats. Additionally, SRT‐treated acromegalic cats with DM will e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
45
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
45
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Conformity, gradient, and heterogeneity indices are commonly used to describe stereotactic radiotherapy treatment plans. The conformity index describes how the volume of a stereotactic radiotherapy plan conforms to the size and shape of the planning target volume, with values <2 being recommended, and values closer to 1 being ideal . Gradient index describes how steep the dose gradient is outside of the planning target volume, with smaller values having steeper gradients .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conformity, gradient, and heterogeneity indices are commonly used to describe stereotactic radiotherapy treatment plans. The conformity index describes how the volume of a stereotactic radiotherapy plan conforms to the size and shape of the planning target volume, with values <2 being recommended, and values closer to 1 being ideal . Gradient index describes how steep the dose gradient is outside of the planning target volume, with smaller values having steeper gradients .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high percentage of diabetic remission and definitive cure exceeds outcomes of previously reported medical treatment and radiation therapy. 2,13,14,[16][17][18] The most consistent effect of radiotherapy is the improvement or resolution of signs of neurological disease because of tumor size reduction; however, remission of hypersomatotropism and DM is often not achieved. In a recent publication on radiotherapy as treatment of hypersomatotropism in cats, stereotactic radiation therapy resulted in diabetic remission in 32% of the cats and in more than one third of these cats remission was only temporarily.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heterogeneity index (HI) describes PTV dose variation, and can be calculated with the simpler Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) calculation where <2 is ideal, or with a more strict calculation using D98 and D2 (this calculation reveals more heterogeneity; values will vary widely by plan although the ideal value is 0) 28 . Table 6 shows that all CI were reasonably close to unity (median CI = 0.81 and 1.10, based on two different equations, respectively 26,28 ), GI was similar to the Paddick study for stereotactic wherein GI values were 2.4 to 3.3 27 (median GI = 3.35 in the current study), all cases had acceptable RTOG HI (median HI = 1.12), and 7/8 cases had alternate HI values ≤15 suggesting some heterogeneity in the approved plans 29 . Values for CI, GI and HI were only evaluated retrospectively and were not used in plan approval.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Conformity index (CI) describes how dose conforms to the PTV, with values <2 recommended, values closer to 1 ideal and two different common equations utilized. CI does not account for whether the dose is in the same location at the target 26‐28 . Gradient index (GI) describes how quickly the dose drops outside the PTV, with smaller values representing steeper gradients 29 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%