2015
DOI: 10.1080/09658211.2015.1036885
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stereotype threat reduces false recognition when older adults are forewarned

Abstract: Exposing older adults to ageing stereotypes can reduce their memory for studied information--a phenomenon attributed to stereotype threat--but little is known about stereotype effects on false memory. Here, we assessed ageing stereotype effects on the Deese-Roediger-McDermott false memory illusion. Older adults studied lists of semantically associated words, and then read a passage about age-related memory decline (threat condition) or an age-neutral passage (control condition). They then took a surprise memor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
2
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
16
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It has also recently been shown that invoking aging and memory stereotype threats before testing alters false memory rates. Invoking a stereotype threat explicitly, by providing participants with summaries of research supporting an age-related memory decline, reduces false recall and recognition, potentially because older adults adopt a more conservative response criterion (Barber and Mather, 2013; Wong and Gallo, 2015). Interestingly, if the threat is invoked implicitly, by subliminally presenting negative age-related words (e.g., ‘feeble’), older adults are more likely to make false alarms, possibly because controlled monitoring processes are disrupted by anxiety over the testing situation (Krendl et al, 2015).…”
Section: Further Questions and Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has also recently been shown that invoking aging and memory stereotype threats before testing alters false memory rates. Invoking a stereotype threat explicitly, by providing participants with summaries of research supporting an age-related memory decline, reduces false recall and recognition, potentially because older adults adopt a more conservative response criterion (Barber and Mather, 2013; Wong and Gallo, 2015). Interestingly, if the threat is invoked implicitly, by subliminally presenting negative age-related words (e.g., ‘feeble’), older adults are more likely to make false alarms, possibly because controlled monitoring processes are disrupted by anxiety over the testing situation (Krendl et al, 2015).…”
Section: Further Questions and Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used the same stereotype manipulation as in Wong and Gallo (2016). Older adults in the stereotype conditions read a passage containing scientific findings of agerelated decline in memory, word-finding, and multitasking, whereas older adult controls read an age-neutral passage on language.…”
Section: Stereotype Manipulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To our knowledge, only three studies have explicitly activated aging stereotypes after the encoding phase but before the memory task, so that only retrieval could be affected. Thomas and Dubois (2011) found that activating stereotypes just before retrieval increased false recognition errors in the DRM task (Roediger & McDermott, 1995), whereas Wong and Gallo (2016) found the opposite result with a modified DRM procedure. In a follow-up study that compared the two DRM procedures, Smith, Gallo, Barber, Maddox, & Thomas (in press) obtained results that were more consistent with Thomas and Dubois (2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consistent with the idea of a prevention focus, older adults under stereotype threat have been found to be more risk-averse in their decision making compared to non-threatened older adults (Coudin and Alexopoulos 2010), and respond more slowly (Popham and Hess 2015). In addition, stereotype threat was found to reduce older adults' (veridical) recall and recognition, but improve memory accuracy (Barber and Mather 2013b;Wong and Gallo 2016).…”
Section: Understanding Stereotype Threat Effectsmentioning
confidence: 75%