2019
DOI: 10.1111/josl.12376
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stereotypes and chronotopes: The peasant and the cosmopolitan in narratives about migration*

Abstract: Stereotypes are chronotopic (Bakhtin, 1994) in the sense that they make good use of character types in time and space to utter identifiable speech forms and make evident other semiotic displays. This paper argues for sociolinguistics to expand its interpretation of the chronotope to encompass the relationship between “character” and “author” in identity texts. It suggests that conflating author and character in identity scholarship, as is the case in much sociolinguistic research, risks losing an opportunity t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The role of the researcher in supplementing the voices of less privileged persons has long been debated, maintaining that entextualization , that is, the making of a new text lifted out of its original interactional setting, and the decontextualization that follows when the text is inserted in new alternative contexts, is an authorial act that has unanticipated political effects (Bauman & Briggs, 1990:73; Bucholtz, 2000; Vigouroux, 2009). There is, for instance, an imminent risk of reproducing inequality by reinforcing stereotypical categories and ideas about people, especially if they are presented as victims of oppression without their own agency (Creese & Blacklegde, 2020; Spivak, 2020). It also has been claimed that such imposed recognition only gives a symbolic voice to people (Fraser & Honneth, 2003) and that everyone has the capacity to express and author their own voice.…”
Section: Interpretation and Representation Of Voicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of the researcher in supplementing the voices of less privileged persons has long been debated, maintaining that entextualization , that is, the making of a new text lifted out of its original interactional setting, and the decontextualization that follows when the text is inserted in new alternative contexts, is an authorial act that has unanticipated political effects (Bauman & Briggs, 1990:73; Bucholtz, 2000; Vigouroux, 2009). There is, for instance, an imminent risk of reproducing inequality by reinforcing stereotypical categories and ideas about people, especially if they are presented as victims of oppression without their own agency (Creese & Blacklegde, 2020; Spivak, 2020). It also has been claimed that such imposed recognition only gives a symbolic voice to people (Fraser & Honneth, 2003) and that everyone has the capacity to express and author their own voice.…”
Section: Interpretation and Representation Of Voicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Blommaert (2019) demonstrates that individuals rely on 'chunks of history' when they perform identity in the interactional present (Blommaert 2015: 12). Creese and Blackledge (2019) analyse time and place in relation to stereotypes about the migrant, separating 'author', 'character' and 'text' to allow for nuanced ways of theorising identity performance. These examples illustrate how the widely adopted interpretation of chronotopes in sociolinguistics is that they can be used to explain the performance of identity and how it continues to emerge and change due to time and place motifs.…”
Section: Chronotopesin Translanguaging Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Works discovering biased words overcome some of the limitations of attesting by enumerating all the words that are biased towards others in a word embeddings model [4], [28], [29], [30], [31]. However, the resulting lists of biased words do not explain what these biases mean or to what extent they are important in the context of a community, both of which are needed to properly interpret and study the biases discovered in a community [16], [17], [18]. Our previous work in this direction is presented in [32], in which we define a system to identify a set of words biased towards certain concepts, and organize them in categories in order to compare their biases.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These limitations make current approaches unsuitable to study biases in the language of online communities. This is because such communities often exhibit biases distinct from those in mainstream culture [15], so anticipating potential biases in advance is difficult; and because understanding the meaning of those biases is needed to properly interpret and study them [16], [17], [18]. Studying the biases of online communities is very important to tackle the social problems they have been associated with, such as radicalization [15] and discrimination against some types of users, particularly those users • Xavier Ferrer, Department of Informatics, King's College London.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%