2008
DOI: 10.1080/09658210801895948
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stereotypes influence false memories for imagined events

Abstract: Two experiments tested the influences of vivid imagery and person schemata on eyewitness accuracy. Participants watched an event sequence including actors performing stereotype-consistent and inconsistent actions. Additionally, participants either read descriptions of actions (Experiment 1) or vividly imagined actions (Experiment 2). After either 30 minutes or 2 days, recognition memory, source memory, and remember/know judgements were made. After 2 days, false alarms to imagined events increased, relative to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, future research should explore the extent to which different facial characteristics, including criminality, influence source monitoring. Moreover, given that stereotype-driven thinking can induce distortions of memory (e.g., Kleider, Goldinger, & Knuycky, 2008;Ottati, Claypool, & Gingrich, 2005;Snyder & Uranowitz, 1978), it seems possible that facial stereotypes could lead people to remember others doing things that never truly occurred. This is an important issue for future research to consider.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, future research should explore the extent to which different facial characteristics, including criminality, influence source monitoring. Moreover, given that stereotype-driven thinking can induce distortions of memory (e.g., Kleider, Goldinger, & Knuycky, 2008;Ottati, Claypool, & Gingrich, 2005;Snyder & Uranowitz, 1978), it seems possible that facial stereotypes could lead people to remember others doing things that never truly occurred. This is an important issue for future research to consider.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kleider, Goldinger, & Knuycky, 2008;Kleider, Pezdek, Goldinger, & Kirk, 2008; Sherman & Bessenhof, 1999); and for household scenes (Roediger, Meade, & Bergman, 2001). …”
Section: Shapes Memory For Fictional Life Storiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of other investigators have likewise carried out schema research in this tradition, by probing for the effects of schema-consistency on either correct and/or incorrect recognition and/or recall. Thus, in addition to further studies on room schemata (Lampinen, Copeland, & Neushatz, 2001;Nemeth & Belli, 2006;Pezdek et al, 1989), researchers have probed for the mnemonic influence of schemata for eyewitness-related material, such as crime scenes (Holst & Pezdek, 1992;List, 1986;Smith & Studebaker, 1996;Tuckey & Brewer, 2003); for the behavior of instructors in a classroom (Neuschatz, Lampinen, Preston, Hawkins, & Toglia, 2002); for common scenes such as taking one's dog to the veterinarian or going to the beach (Bower, Black, & Turner, 1979;Graesser, Gordon, & Sawyer, 1979;Graesser, Woll, Kowalski, & Smith, 1980;Lampinen, Faries, Neuschatz, & Toglia, 2000;Shapiro & Fox, 2002;Smith & Graesser, 1981); for stereotypes about categories of people (e.g., gender stereotypes; Kleider, Goldinger, & Knuycky, 2008;Kleider, Pezdek, Goldinger, & Kirk, 2008;Sherman & Bessenhof, 1999); and for household scenes (Roediger, Meade, & Bergman, 2001).…”
Section: Shapes Memory For Fictional Life Storiesmentioning
confidence: 99%