Stereotyping as Discrimination: Why Thoughts Can Be Discriminatory

Abstract

Can we treat people in a discriminatory way in virtue of how we think about them? In this essay, I argue that the answer is yes. According to the constitutive claim, stereotyping constitutes discrimination, either sometimes or always. This essay defends the constitutive claim and explores the deeper justifications for it. I also sketch the constitutive claim's larger ethical significance. One upshot is that we can wrongfully discriminate against (or in favor of) others in thought, even if we keep our views of others to ourselves. Second, if stereotyping is a form of discrimination, theories of wrongful discrimination bear on the ethical questions associated with stereotyping, including this one: under what conditions is it wrong to stereotype? In closing, I introduce an intriguing possibility, namely, that stereotyping is wrong if and when it constitutes wrongful discrimination.

Queer People in Business: An Exploration of their Lived Experiences in their Workplace

“…Mattheis et al [11] shared the same sentiment that queer employees would prefer not to come out at work because they do not want it to be a big deal and interfere with their work, unless the workplace is generally accepting of them. The study of Beeghly [12] provided that prior experiences frequently shape such prejudices and can be affected by the organization's cultural and demographic makeup. The remarks of IDI4 and IDI7 that prejudice and exclusion are relatively frequent everywhere but are most specifically experienced by them are supported by these remarks about this study.…”

Characterizing and Measuring Racial Discrimination in Public Health Research

“…My argument is for the claim that we need different characterizations of racially discriminatory experiences to capture cases of attributionally ambiguous discrimination and attributionally clear racial discrimination (including racial discrimination and intersectional discrimination). There are at least three characterizations of discrimination: (1) drawing distinctions between social groups with or without importing normative significance (e.g., statistical discrimination), (2) articulating or putting into effect group-specific norms, rules, or evaluative standards, and (3) internal mental states (such as stereotypes or intentions) leading to differential treatment towards an individual because of their presumed group membership (Lippert-Rasmussen 2018; Beeghly 2021).…”

Mudling Through Intersectionality Theory for Leadership Futures: Pathways Toward Policies for Reinventing Gender Spaces for Educational Leadership in Two Male Schools in Ghana

“…For instance, a married woman's major role is to enhance her husband's career goals, by providing him with moral and emotional support, and therefore women can only pursue their professional dreams after fulfilling their culturally accepted roles (Malovi, 2014). Beeghly (2014) has also noted that women's gender identities were embedded in responsibilities for care that extended beyond mothering young children and included the care of husband and adult children and grandchildren. In some cases, women intentionally avoided work outside the home to have time to maintain family relationships.…”