2022
DOI: 10.1101/2022.12.15.520588
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Steric Communication between Dynamic Components on DNA nanodevices

Abstract: Biomolecular nanotechnology has helped emulate basic robotic capabilities such as defined motion, sensing, and actuation in synthetic nanoscale systems. DNA origami is an attractive approach for nanorobotics, as it enables creation of devices with complex geometry, programmed motion, rapid actuation, force application, and various kinds of sensing modalities. Advanced robotic functions like feedback control, autonomy, or programmed routines also require the ability to transmit signals among sub-components. Pri… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the time saved for the entire experiment labor work would be dependent on the target throughput. For example, it typically takes more than 300 particles for sampling dynamic structures with a single condition [9], [35], [36] . Doing the manual annotation for a dataset of ~300-500 particles to directly provide the ground truth could be completed within several hours, which is comparable to the time required to obtain datasets for training and testing DNN performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, the time saved for the entire experiment labor work would be dependent on the target throughput. For example, it typically takes more than 300 particles for sampling dynamic structures with a single condition [9], [35], [36] . Doing the manual annotation for a dataset of ~300-500 particles to directly provide the ground truth could be completed within several hours, which is comparable to the time required to obtain datasets for training and testing DNN performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ideally, the Resnet50 DNN pose estimation could be applied to a variety of dynamic DNA origami devices To test the robustness of the approach, we applied the same Resnet50 architecture for two other previously obtained particle image datasets: 1) a dataset of hinge devices with incorporated nucleosome (i.e. DNA wrapped around a histone protein core, which is the base packing unit of genomic DNA in eukaryotes) where the nucleosome position is of interest [9], and 2) a dynamic devices with two fluctuating arms where the angular conformation of both arms are of interest [35]. Using the same training protocol, we trained Resnet50 models to predict specified critical features of the device s. e conformations.…”
Section: Pose Estimation Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…42 An example of such a system can be inferred from Cao et al, 11 where DNA origamis are grafted to a surface by means of long single stranded tethers. As in most DNA origami applications, we expect binding between different molecules to be reaction-limited 23,43,44 and thus binding rates will scale as κQ(ϵ) with ϵ roughly the diameter of the molecules involved. By introducing placement techniques such as lithography 45−47 to further control the position of these tethered structures, the methodology and results here introduced can rapidly inform the selection of the optimal relations between tether lengths and locations to strategically maximize (or minimize) assembly times between different nanocomponents at relatively low computational cost, facilitating precise control over the assembly process.…”
Section: ■ Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%