Sterile Water Injection for Labor Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Hutton, E.K.; Kasperink, M; Rutten, M.P.M.H.; Reitsma, Angela; Wainman, Bruce

doi:10.1097/01.aoa.0000386847.67783.a5

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…8 Sterile water intracutaneous injection on 4 points procedure at lumbosacral area is an easy and well studied to decrease visceral pain. 9 This technique was simple, inexpensive, has minimal side effect, and could be given by general physician. [10][11][12] One of the side effects of sterile water injection is inducing localized sharp pain on injection site that last for 20-30 sec.…”

Section: Abstrak Tujuan: Mengetahui Perbandingan Skor Visual Analog Smentioning

confidence: 99%

One Point Technique of Intracutaneous Sterile Water Injection is as Effective as Four Points Technique in the Management of Labor Pain

Ismail¹

2016

Indones J Obstet Gynecol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To compare the score of VAS (visual analog scale), length of labor, and APGAR score in intracutaneous sterile water injection between one point technique and four points technique at Michaelis Rhomboid area in management of labor pain. Method: This is an experimental study, subjects were included by blinded controlled randomized study on 50 women with term pregnancy stage I active phase and were planned for spontaneous delivery. Subjects were divided into 2 groups randomly, 25 women with 0.5 ml sterile water intracutaneous injection on 4 points and 25 women with that on 1 point injection at one site at the painful area. Result: Reduction of labor pain on 1-point technique could decrease VAS score the most, 85.4 (4.3) into 48.4 (8.5) on minute 10. Length of labor was 11.2 (1.15) on 1 point injection group compared to 11.4 (1.2) on those with 4 point injection. On the other hand, APGAR score of the baby on group having 1-point injection was 7.86 (0.5) on min 1 and 9.68 (0.5) on min 5, compared to that on 4-points injection group, 7.52 (0.7) and 9.56 (0.5), respectively. In addition, 60% felt uncomfortable with 1-point injection whereas 80% of patients felt uncomfortable in 4-points injection. Conclusion: There is no significant difference on reduction of VAS score, duration of labor, and APGAR score of the baby between the group having 1 point injection and 4-point injection. However, injection on 1 point is more comfortable. [Indones J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 36-4: 167-70] Keywords: APGAR , intracutaneous sterile water injection, length of labor, VAS

show abstract

Section: Abstrak Tujuan: Mengetahui Perbandingan Skor Visual Analog Smentioning

confidence: 99%

One Point Technique of Intracutaneous Sterile Water Injection is as Effective as Four Points Technique in the Management of Labor Pain

Ismail¹

2016

Indones J Obstet Gynecol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Sterile Water Injection for Labor Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Cited by 1 publication

References 0 publications

One Point Technique of Intracutaneous Sterile Water Injection is as Effective as Four Points Technique in the Management of Labor Pain

One Point Technique of Intracutaneous Sterile Water Injection is as Effective as Four Points Technique in the Management of Labor Pain

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About