Sterilization of Surgical Tools: Removing Bacterial Endospores with a Combination of Povidone-iodine, Chlorhexidine Gluconate, Ethanol, and Methanol

Razzaq, Tweij-Thu Alfeqar; Shnan, Al-Jameel–Dheyaa; Ali, Alaasam-Bassim Mohammed

doi:10.22207/jpam.13.4.65

Cited by 6 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Another 38 articles were found in the gray literature, 19 by a senior expert indication [ 19 , 39 , 89 , 117 , 118 , 119 , 120 , 121 , 122 , 123 , 124 , 125 , 126 , 127 , 128 , 129 , 130 , 131 , 132 ], and 19 from searching citations [ 38 , 48 , 133 , 134 , 135 , 136 , 137 , 138 , 139 , 140 , 141 , 142 , 143 , 144 , 145 , 146 , 147 , 148 , 149 ], resulting in a total of 142 articles for the scoping review, according to the study workflow in Figure 1 . Another 21 articles were used to describe the essential definitions in Section 2.2.1 and Section 3 [ 1 , 17 , 20 , 21 , 42 , 46 , 91 , …”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Additionally, the literature suggests that the ideal hygiene method is to associate cleaning solutions for immersing dentures with brushing. The most used solutions are alkaline peroxides [ 18 , 19 , 23 , 24 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 ], sodium hypochlorite [ 2 , 19 , 41 , 44 , 49 , 50 ], and chlorhexidine [ 19 , 45 , 46 , 50 , 51 , 52 ]. Regarding the immersion time, subjects usually keep their dentures immersed in these solutions overnight [ 18 ] and the literature shows that long immersion periods impact tissue inflammation reduction [ 40 , 49 ]; however, they can cause adverse effects on the materials used in the manufacturing of dentures [ 53 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Strategies for Preventing and Treating Oral Mucosal Infections Associated with Removable Dentures: A Scoping Review

Ribeiro,

Pizziolo,

Clemente

et al. 2024

Antibiotics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Oral infections occur due to contact between biofilm rich in Candida albicans formed on the inner surface of complete dentures and the mucosa. This study investigated historical advances in the prevention and treatment of oral mucosal infection and identified gaps in the literature. Bibliographic research was conducted, looking at PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus, where 935 articles were found. After removing duplicates and excluding articles by reading the title and abstract, 131 articles were selected for full reading and 104 articles were included. Another 38 articles were added from the gray literature. This review followed the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. The historical period described ranges from 1969 to 2023, in which, during the 21st century, in vitro and in vivo studies became more common and, from 2010 to 2023, the number of randomized controlled trials increased. Among the various approaches tested are the incorporation of antimicrobial products into prosthetic materials, the improvement of oral and denture hygiene protocols, the development of synthetic and natural products for the chemical control of microorganisms, and intervention with local or systemic antimicrobial agents. Studies report good results with brushing combined with sodium hypochlorite, and new disinfectant solutions and products incorporated into prosthetic materials are promising.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Strategies for Preventing and Treating Oral Mucosal Infections Associated with Removable Dentures: A Scoping Review

Ribeiro,

Pizziolo,

Clemente

et al. 2024

Antibiotics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…[3,4,5] Chemical disinfection reduces the microbial load and the disinfectants used most frequently for cold sterilization are Glutaraldehyde, Hydrogen peroxide, Alcohol, Povidone iodine and Chlorhexidine. [14] So, in the present study the efficacy of three disinfectants, Chlorhexidine, Povidone iodine and Glutaraldehyde were evaluated against the most commonly isolated organisms (Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus mutans, and Lactobacillus acidophilus) from as received brackets, archwires and molar bands.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparative Evaluation of Antibacterial Activity of Chlorhexidine, Povidone Iodine and Glutaraldehyde for Disinfection of Orthodontic Appliances - An In-Vitro Study

Jeyapriya¹,

Tania²,

Rathore³

et al. 2023

IJOrthoR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: Orthodontist must take precautionary measures to protect patients from cross-infection by contaminated materials received from the manufacturers. To minimize the incidence of cross-infection prior to bonding an invitro study was done to assess the antibacterial activity of chlorhexidine, povidone iodine and glutaraldehyde. Aim: To compare the antibacterial activity of 2% chlorhexidine, 5% povidone iodine and 2% glutaraldehyde on orthodontic materials prior to bonding. Materials and methods: A total of 36 samples were included in this study. The main group consists of 3 disinfectants and one control group (n =4). Group -1(Chlorhexidine gluconate), Group - 2 (Povidone Iodine), Group - 3 (Glutaraldehyde) and Group - 4 (Control group –untreated). Each group consists of 3 subgroups of the tested samples namely group A (brackets), group B (archwires) and group C - molar bands (n=9). which were contaminated by 3 bacterial species streptococcus, staphylococcus, lactobacillus and the number of colonies were counted before disinfection. The contaminated samples were subjected to disinfection with 2% chlorhexidine for 5 minutes 2% glutaraldehyde and 5% Povidone Iodine for 10 minutes. 20µl of sample of the disinfected samples were incubated and the number of colonies were counted after disinfection. Results: There were no colonies formed when 5% Povidone iodine was used to disinfect archwires and molarbands in few tested samples. 2% glutaraldehyde and 2% chlorhexidine were not effective against lactobacillus species. Povidone iodine was effective when compared to glutaraldehyde and chlorhexidine gluconate and effective against all the three species namely Streptococcus, Staphylococcus and Lactobacilli species. The obtained p-value is < 0.001 which is statistically significant when all groups were compared overall. Conclusion: Disinfection with 5% povidone iodine was most effective when compared with 2% chlorhexidine and 2% glutaraldehyde.

show abstract

“…for mouthwashes) [34,35] . Higher concentrations of 0.5% to 5% (and even up to 10 wt%) are employed for skin and surgical tool disinfection and for antibacterial coatings on medical devices [35][36][37][38]41] .…”

Section: Antimicrobial Performance Of Chx Treatmentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…CHx is widely used in clinical settings for skin disinfection before and during surgery and injections, to sterilise surgical instruments and devices (e.g. catheters), across the field of dentistry from mouthwash to oral gel products to root canal irrigating solutions, and in various drug delivery devices [34,[36][37][38] .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Chlorhexidine digluconate exerts bactericidal activity vs Gram positive Staphylococci with bioelectrocatalytic compatibility: High level disinfection for implantable biofuel cells

Berezovska

Meiller

Marinesco

et al. 2023

Bioelectrochemistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Sterilization of Surgical Tools: Removing Bacterial Endospores with a Combination of Povidone-iodine, Chlorhexidine Gluconate, Ethanol, and Methanol

Cited by 6 publications

References 28 publications

Strategies for Preventing and Treating Oral Mucosal Infections Associated with Removable Dentures: A Scoping Review

Strategies for Preventing and Treating Oral Mucosal Infections Associated with Removable Dentures: A Scoping Review

Comparative Evaluation of Antibacterial Activity of Chlorhexidine, Povidone Iodine and Glutaraldehyde for Disinfection of Orthodontic Appliances - An In-Vitro Study

Chlorhexidine digluconate exerts bactericidal activity vs Gram positive Staphylococci with bioelectrocatalytic compatibility: High level disinfection for implantable biofuel cells

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About