2008
DOI: 10.1097/bsd.0b013e31815c5f96
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sternocleidomastoid Muscle Flap in Esophageal Perforation Repair After Cervical Spine Surgery

Abstract: Esophageal perforation treatment has to be multidisciplinary and tailored on each individual case. SCM muscle flap, used as reinforcement of a primary suture or as a patch to the lesion, has proved to be effective as definitive treatment for persisting or recurring esophageal fistulae after anterior cervical spine surgery. In this setting, conservative treatments may be inadequate or may actually perpetuate the condition.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…16 Sternocleidomastoid muscle flaps have also been used to successfully close cervical esophageal fistulas after anterior cervical spine surgery. 17,18 Other moderately aggressive interventions include the use of covered metal stents to occlude anastomotic leaks. 4,19 However, these methods do not negate the need for drainage and debridement of necrotic tissue if present.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 Sternocleidomastoid muscle flaps have also been used to successfully close cervical esophageal fistulas after anterior cervical spine surgery. 17,18 Other moderately aggressive interventions include the use of covered metal stents to occlude anastomotic leaks. 4,19 However, these methods do not negate the need for drainage and debridement of necrotic tissue if present.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the most preferable therapeutic strategy is immediate surgical repair (3,91,93,95,(101)(102)(103)(104)(105). The importance of intraoperative or early recognition of this complication cannot be overemphasized.…”
Section: Esophageal Perforationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All duplicate articles, abstracts, review articles, and letters to the editor were excluded. [1][2][3][4][5]8,10,[13][14][15][16][17][18][20][21][22][23][60][61][62]64,65,[67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75] Title and abstract review was performed once the initial list of studies was generated (Fig. 1).…”
Section: Study Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%