What is already known about this topic? Fixed airflow obstruction in patients with asthma has been associated with reduced responsiveness to asthma medications.What does this article add to our knowledge? Omalizumab reduced exacerbations in patients with high bronchodilator reversibility and fixed airflow obstruction and improved lung function in patients without fixed airflow obstruction and high bronchodilator reversibility.How does this study impact current management guidelines? Identifying patient characteristics associated with improved outcomes with omalizumab may help to define patient populations that are more likely to derive benefit from omalizumab.BACKGROUND: Although asthma is typically characterized by bronchodilator responsiveness (BDR), fixed airflow obstruction (FAO) occurs in w50% of patients with severe asthma. OBJECTIVE: Do FAO/BDR associate with efficacy of omalizumab, a monoclonal antibody that targets IgE? METHODS: In EXTRA, patients aged 12-75 years with inadequately controlled severe allergic asthma despite high-dose inhaled corticosteroids plus long-acting b 2 -agonists were randomized to omalizumab (n [ 427) or placebo (n [ 423) for 48 weeks of treatment. In this post hoc analysis, high/low BDR were defined as ‡12%/<12% increases in baseline forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV 1 ) after bronchodilator administration, respectively. FAO presence (D)/absence (L) were defined as baseline postbronchodilator FEV 1 /forced vital capacity <70%/ ‡70%, respectively. Poisson regression/analysis of covariance models were used to estimate exacerbation relative rate reductions (RRRs)/least-squares mean changes in FEV 1 , respectively. RESULTS: In patients with high BDR, omalizumab reduced exacerbations more than placebo over the 48-week treatment period regardless of FAO status (RRR [95% confidence interval (CI)]: FAOD, 59. FAOL,). Omalizumab improved FEV 1 compared with placebo in the FAOL, high BDR subgroup (FEV 1 change from baseline [95% CI] for omalizumab vs placebo, 0.065 L [e0.071 to 0.201 L] to 0.236 L [0.112-0.359 L]) across 48 weeks. This was not observed in patients with low BDR, irrespective of FAO. CONCLUSION: Omalizumab was more efficacious than placebo at reducing exacerbations in patients with high, but not low, BDR, regardless of the presence of FAO. Lung function improvement primarily occurred in FAOL, high BDR patients, suggesting that