“…The CTE identified in DR2 of the PrC strain of ASV was previously localized to between nt 8770 and 8925 (Ogert et al+, 1996)+ To confirm that a functional CTE is also present in the ALV, which contain only a single DR, we subcloned the equivalent sequence from a previously described RAV-2 ALV isolate (Bizub et al+, 1984) into the indicator construct pDM128/PL (Fridell et al+, 1993)+ This 159-bp sequence extends 3 bp 39 and 156 bp 59 to the 59 boundary of the ALV LTR and is 68% identical to the equivalent DR2 sequence in the PrC strain of ASV+ As previously described (Hope et al+, 1990), the pDM128 indicator plasmid contains a 59 and a 39 splice site, derived from the HIV-1 env gene, flanking an intronic cat indicator gene+ pDM128/PL additionally contains a polylinker between the cat gene and the 39 splice site, thus permitting the introduction of sequences of interest, such as the ALV CTE or, as previously described, the MPMV CTE or the HIV-1 RRE (Fridell et al+, 1993;Bogerd et al+, 1998)+ Because the cat gene is located between functional 59 and 39 splice sites, CAT enzyme expression is dependent on the nuclear export and translation of an unspliced mRNA, a process that, for the reasons described above, is normally very inefficient+ However, the introduction of an active CTE or of the HIV-1 RRE in cis (in the latter case in the presence of Rev) results in the efficient nuclear export of this unspliced mRNA and, hence, in a marked induction in CAT expression+ We therefore asked whether introduction of the putative ALV CTE would exert a similar effect+ Initially, we transfected the quail cell line QCl-3, which is permissive for RAV-2 replication (Cullen et al+, 1983), FIGURE 1. Schematic representation of the genomic organization of ALV and ASV+ The ASVs, such as Rous Sarcoma Virus, arose because of the recombinational acquisition of the host-cell-derived src gene by ALVs+ This resulted in a duplication of the 39 noncoding sequence located between the env gene and the LTR in the ALVs and this duplicated sequence was hence referred to as the direct repeat+ SD: splice donor; SA: splice acceptor+ with the parental pDM128/PL construct, with derivatives containing the ALV CTE sequence in the sense or anti-sense orientation, or with a pDM128/PL derivative containing the MPMV CTE+ As shown in Figure 2, the sense orientation ALV CTE potently activated CAT expression from the pDM128 indicator plasmid, whereas the same ALV sequence in the anti-sense orientation had no detectable effect+ As previously described , the MPMV CTE is not active in quail cells and the pDM128 construct containing this CTE was therefore also essentially inactive+ Whereas the MPMV CTE is active in human but not quail cells, the PrC ASV CTE was initially reported to be active in avian cells but not primate cells (Ogert et al+, 1996)+ To examine the species tropism of the ALV CTE, we compared the activity of these same four indicator plasmids upon transfection into the human cell line 293T, the simian cell line COS, or the murine L cell line+ As may be observed (Fig+ 2), both the ALV CTE and the MPMV CTE proved to be equivalently active in all three of these distinct cell types+ Therefore, based on this limited analysis, the ALV CTE does not display any obvious species tropism+ In fact, recent unpublished experiments utilizing the PrC ASV CTE demonstrate that this CTE is also active in hu...…”