2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2012.04.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Steroids in a typical swine farm and their release into the environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
81
1
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 155 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
4
81
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…A previous study reported nine compounds of progestagens (total concentrations up to 57 ng/L in influent, 8 ng/L in effluent, and 13 ng/g in dehydrated sludge samples) in a municipal WWTP in Beijing, China [10]. Moreover, the results from the present study confirmed that swine farms and WWTPs are the main sources of progestagens in the environment [12,32]. Comparing with influent, effluent contained less and lower target compounds (total concentrations 5 ng/L), indicating that the treatment processes of the WWTP could effectively remove or transform progestagens.…”
Section: Application To Environmental Samplessupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A previous study reported nine compounds of progestagens (total concentrations up to 57 ng/L in influent, 8 ng/L in effluent, and 13 ng/g in dehydrated sludge samples) in a municipal WWTP in Beijing, China [10]. Moreover, the results from the present study confirmed that swine farms and WWTPs are the main sources of progestagens in the environment [12,32]. Comparing with influent, effluent contained less and lower target compounds (total concentrations 5 ng/L), indicating that the treatment processes of the WWTP could effectively remove or transform progestagens.…”
Section: Application To Environmental Samplessupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Among all the sample matrices, flush water contained the most progestagens with the highest concentrations (total concentrations more than 10,000 ng/L), followed by feces (total concentrations nearly 6,000 ng/g). Previous studies reported that progesterone was detected in piled manure in USA at the concentration of 196 ng/g [20] and progesterone and norgestrel in flush [9], [11], [12], [20], [30], [31], [33], [34], [35], [36] AD anordrin, CMD chlormadinone, CMDA chlormadinone acetate, CPRA cyproterone acetate, DGT dydrogesterone, 5α-DHP samples from a swine farm in Guangxi (China) with their concentrations above 10,000 ng/L [32]. In the WWTP, influent contained the most progestagens (total concentrations up to 81 ng/L), followed by dewatered sludge (total concentrations up to 23 ng/g).…”
Section: Application To Environmental Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Progestins have been detected in surface waters [9][10][11] and wastewaters [12][13][14]. Norgestrel was found in surface water at concentrations up to 22 ng L À1 [11] and in municipal wastewater-treatment plant effluents at concentrations up to 11 ng L À1 [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The waste of livestock has been proved to be one of the major sources of environmental estrogen, 16,17 and compared with piglets and barrows, sows produce varied classes of steroids, including estrogens and androgens, at much higher concentrations. 18 The onset of HA in fish has been reported to be associated with the environmental contamination including steroids. 19 We therefore suspect whether the environmental steroid exposure might, to some extent, contribute to the simultaneous development of HA in two siblings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%