2015
DOI: 10.21768/ejopa.v4i3.95
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stewards of Place: The Role of Dialogue and Deliberation in Strengthening Our Universities and Colleges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Deliberative pedagogy helps to broaden how university stakeholders think about engaged pedagogies, especially when considering the intersection of engagement and democratic processes. When they expand their conceptualization of engaged pedagogies to include deliberation, discussion, and/or dialogue, they find scholarly interest in the roles of discourse and engagement in higher education settings (Brookfield & Preskill, 2005;Dedrick, Grattan, & Dienstfrey, 2008;Sara A. Mehltretter Drury, 2015;Isgro & Deal, 2013;Latimer & Hempson, 2012;Lawrence, Justus, Murray, & Brown, 2015;Longo, 2013;Shaffer, 2014Shaffer, , 2016Shaffer, Longo, Manosevitch, & Thomas, 2017). As Murti (2009) wrote: One of my reasons for adopting deliberative dialogue as a pedagogical tool in preference over debates lay in the fact that deliberative dialogue goes beyond these adversarial forms of communication that see their raison d'être in the dichotomy of winner/loser.…”
Section: Pedagogical Approaches: Changing Classroom Culturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deliberative pedagogy helps to broaden how university stakeholders think about engaged pedagogies, especially when considering the intersection of engagement and democratic processes. When they expand their conceptualization of engaged pedagogies to include deliberation, discussion, and/or dialogue, they find scholarly interest in the roles of discourse and engagement in higher education settings (Brookfield & Preskill, 2005;Dedrick, Grattan, & Dienstfrey, 2008;Sara A. Mehltretter Drury, 2015;Isgro & Deal, 2013;Latimer & Hempson, 2012;Lawrence, Justus, Murray, & Brown, 2015;Longo, 2013;Shaffer, 2014Shaffer, , 2016Shaffer, Longo, Manosevitch, & Thomas, 2017). As Murti (2009) wrote: One of my reasons for adopting deliberative dialogue as a pedagogical tool in preference over debates lay in the fact that deliberative dialogue goes beyond these adversarial forms of communication that see their raison d'être in the dichotomy of winner/loser.…”
Section: Pedagogical Approaches: Changing Classroom Culturementioning
confidence: 99%