2021
DOI: 10.1080/13504622.2021.1964439
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stewardship and beyond? Young people’s lived experience of conservation activities in school grounds

Abstract: This article provides ethnographic insight into the more-than-human relationships enacted through young people's participation in school grounds conservation activities. As a response to the escalating biodiversity crisis, conservation appears well-placed to facilitate young people's development of an environmental ethic of care, and a capacity to work towards addressing environmental issues. Proponents of posthuman pedagogies, however, argue that the 'stewardship' perspective underlying these activities fails… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is especially relevant for environmental education, addressing environmental problems that are conceptualised as wicked, and demanding approaches that reach beyond disciplines, theories and methodological divides, uniting scholars and practitioners. The recent emergence of materially and nonanthropocentrically focused scholarship in human and social sciences attests that simple human centred narratives that pinpoint both blame and possible redemption to human actions don't work (see also Ruck & Mannion, 2021;Taylor, 2020). Environmental humanities (e.g., Krzywoszynska & Marchesi, 2020;Rose et al, 2012), human and animal geographies (Johnston, 2008;Jones, 2009) or childhood studies (Authors) focus on decentring the human individual as a psychological construct and instead highlight relationality and entanglement as the onto-epistemological basis of human relations to other species and to the environment as whole (Muller, Hemming, & Rigney, 2019;Taylor & Pacini-Ketchabaw, 2018).…”
Section: Conclusion: Additive Environmental Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is especially relevant for environmental education, addressing environmental problems that are conceptualised as wicked, and demanding approaches that reach beyond disciplines, theories and methodological divides, uniting scholars and practitioners. The recent emergence of materially and nonanthropocentrically focused scholarship in human and social sciences attests that simple human centred narratives that pinpoint both blame and possible redemption to human actions don't work (see also Ruck & Mannion, 2021;Taylor, 2020). Environmental humanities (e.g., Krzywoszynska & Marchesi, 2020;Rose et al, 2012), human and animal geographies (Johnston, 2008;Jones, 2009) or childhood studies (Authors) focus on decentring the human individual as a psychological construct and instead highlight relationality and entanglement as the onto-epistemological basis of human relations to other species and to the environment as whole (Muller, Hemming, & Rigney, 2019;Taylor & Pacini-Ketchabaw, 2018).…”
Section: Conclusion: Additive Environmental Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding concerns about species extinction and their preservation, there are academic contributions related to these issues. Ruck and Mannion (2021) provide an ethnographic view of the more-than-human relationships enacted through youth participation in conservation activities on school grounds. Conservation activities enable ways of thinking about the more-than-human world that transcend any stewardship perspective.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%