2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00105-014-2779-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stichprovokation

Abstract: For the majority of patients quality of life will significantly improve after tolerated sting challenge. A sting challenge test is particularly important in those patients who are at increased risk due their increased risk of treatment failure. If in patients with risk factors for treatment failure, VIT is done with elevated dose or if no risk factors are present, a sting challenge may not be needed. VIT with an elevated dose may prevent or correct treatment failure.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite these findings, up to date no biomarker for the evaluation of VIT efficacy has been established. Therefore, a controlled insect sting challenge remains the golden standard for the evaluation of venom tolerance, indicating clinical protection in humans [11,36,37]. In this study, 3 out of 10 dog owners refused a controlled sting challenge, which is in line with human data [14].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite these findings, up to date no biomarker for the evaluation of VIT efficacy has been established. Therefore, a controlled insect sting challenge remains the golden standard for the evaluation of venom tolerance, indicating clinical protection in humans [11,36,37]. In this study, 3 out of 10 dog owners refused a controlled sting challenge, which is in line with human data [14].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…The efficacy was determined either by accidentally occurring stings, or an in-clinic challenge after 6 months (Figure 2), as published previously for humans undergoing VIT [26]. For the in-clinic challenge, the insect used was entomologically identified.…”
Section: Safety and Efficacy Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 10 According to recommendations, it should be performed 6–18 months after the maintenance dose has been reached, in order to identify non-responders to VIT. 16 In case of a non-response, presented by a systemic allergic reaction to the SC, an increase of the maintenance dose is advised. 10 Risk factors for treatment failure include systemic reactions during VIT, allergy to bee venom, systemic mastocytosis, and elevated serum tryptase levels, as well as concomitant medication with inhibitors of the angiotensin-converting enzyme.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 17 However, a SC should neither be performed before VIT is started nor routinely after a completed course, in order to avoid boosting the allergy. 16 Other absolute contraindications for a SC include severe and uncontrolled systemic diseases (eg, bronchial asthma, hypertension), pregnancy, and/or recurrent systemic reactions during the maintenance period just before the planned SC. 16 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation