2017
DOI: 10.1080/17430437.2017.1329824
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘Stick to Soccer:’ fan reaction and inclusion rhetoric on social media

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fact that nearly one third of public responses in our sample, while not explicitly homophobic, were framed as stick to football with a potential negative social impact possibly reinforces traditional ideas of heteronormativity and articulates a perspective that sport and society can and should exist separately. This reflects the findings of a recent analysis of social media responses to a U.S. Soccer online post that identified that posts resisting the intertwinement of politics and sport were a significant portion of the sample (Cavalier & Newhold, 2018). In much of the public response to the Pride Game in this study, respondents sought to distance themselves from the directly pernicious intent of homophobic language by using qualifiers such as “I’m not homophobic, but…” which still potentially stigmatises the LGBTIQ community while seeking to normalize hegemonic masculinity as the “natural” state.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The fact that nearly one third of public responses in our sample, while not explicitly homophobic, were framed as stick to football with a potential negative social impact possibly reinforces traditional ideas of heteronormativity and articulates a perspective that sport and society can and should exist separately. This reflects the findings of a recent analysis of social media responses to a U.S. Soccer online post that identified that posts resisting the intertwinement of politics and sport were a significant portion of the sample (Cavalier & Newhold, 2018). In much of the public response to the Pride Game in this study, respondents sought to distance themselves from the directly pernicious intent of homophobic language by using qualifiers such as “I’m not homophobic, but…” which still potentially stigmatises the LGBTIQ community while seeking to normalize hegemonic masculinity as the “natural” state.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Decreases in sexual stigma and prejudice have also resulted in greater acceptance of lesbian and bisexual women in sports and have lessened the "lesbian" connotation associated with women's sports (Cahn, 2015;Griffin, 1998;Lenskyj, 2003). Although sports contexts are still commonly viewed as heterosexist, changes that include increasing numbers of athletes coming "out," high-profile campaigns against prejudice and discrimination in sport, and sport organizations' support for laws and policies that address inequalities (e.g., marriage equality) are reshaping them (Anderson et al, 2016;Cavalier & Newhall, 2018: Krane, 2019. Also, notably, sports have traditionally offered unique opportunities for community for individuals who identify as a sexual minority (Barbosa et al, 2020;Carter & Baliko, 2017;Mock et al, 2019;Myrdahl, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The generation and dissipation of excitement and tension associated with the game as well as the noted history of rivalries have been reflected too in online spaces. These studies have positioned football in an instrumental fashion to develop arguments on wider social media issues such as inhibition (e.g., Kavanagh et al, 2016) and reactions to sports organisations espousing political positions (e.g., Cavalier & Newhall, 2018). Here, questions can be asked about the potential generalisability of the findings to any or all sports.…”
Section: Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%