2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00419-012-0668-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stiffness and buckling optimization of thin plates with BEM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to check the methodology and performance of the proposed objective function, a genetic algorithm optimization process for a simple supported beam model has been performed (Fig. 4) [18][19][20].…”
Section: Optimization Process Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to check the methodology and performance of the proposed objective function, a genetic algorithm optimization process for a simple supported beam model has been performed (Fig. 4) [18][19][20].…”
Section: Optimization Process Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, recourse to BEM formulations using the known fundamental solution of the biharmonic equation was inevitable to develop BEM solutions for plates with variable thickness. Moreover, the AEM has been employed to solve more difficult problems for plates with variable thickness such as buckling problems [68], large deflections of plates [69], plates on biparametric elastic foundation [70] as well as plate thickness optimization problems to maximize the buckling load or to minimize the deflection [64]. Later, Chaves et al [66] presented another formulation for the problem.…”
Section: Plates With Variable Thickness 167mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hartmann and Zomantel [25], further developed the method, and implemented it for plate with relatively complex geometries and loadings. Following the above work, others (Tanaka and Miyazaki [62], Fernandes and Venturini [68], Paiva and Aliabadi [42], Albuquerque [2] among others [31,32,55,3,9,41,58,60,23,29,34,64,72]) have further extended the formulation for the classical plate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%