2011
DOI: 10.1080/17480272.2010.534555
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stiffness moduli of various softwood and hardwood species determined with ultrasound

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
2
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, the results indicated clear differences between the SV along the principal directions (SVL > SVR> SVT). The ratios found in this study were somewhat smaller than those reported by Bucur (2006), Keunecke et al (2011), and Baradit and Niemz (2012). There was a good negative correlation between MC and SV, and the correlations are higher in the perpendicular directions.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general, the results indicated clear differences between the SV along the principal directions (SVL > SVR> SVT). The ratios found in this study were somewhat smaller than those reported by Bucur (2006), Keunecke et al (2011), and Baradit and Niemz (2012). There was a good negative correlation between MC and SV, and the correlations are higher in the perpendicular directions.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…According to Bucur (2006), the ultrasonic values of Young's modulus, EL, are slightly higher than the corresponding static measured modulus under compression. It is known that dynamically determined elastic properties are increased by 10% to 20% (or even more, depending on the frequency of ultrasonic waves) compared with statistically calculated values (Keunecke et al 2011).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second (or even third) line corresponds to literature data (Arnould et al 2010;Bader et al 2012Bader et al , 2017Bardet and Gril 2002;Brabec et al 2017;Brémaud et al 2013;Bucur and Archer 1984;Bucur 2006;Borst et al 2012;El Mouridi et al 2011;Fang et al 2008;Garab et al 2010;Gindl 2002;Guitard and El Amri 1987;Hering et al 2012;Keunecke et al 2007Keunecke et al , 2008Keunecke et al , 2011Ozyhar et al 2013a, b;Ruelle et al 2007Ruelle et al , 2011Scholz et al 2007;Sliker 1988Sliker , 1989Timell 1986;Forest Products Laboratory 2010;Zhang and Sliker 1991) where a stands for only one reference value available, b for only one reference value available in the green state and -for no data available. Measurements were taken at ≈ 20 • C and 40%RH of the measured modes m to the elastic coefficients X i (e.g., X i = E T or G TL or RT ), as defined in step 5 of the identification procedure a global fit is performed on these five elastic constants.…”
Section: Results On Beechmentioning
confidence: 99%