2016
DOI: 10.1051/smdo/2016002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stiffness optimization of geometrically nonlinear structures and the level set based solution

Abstract: -Load-normalized strain energy increments between consecutive load steps are aggregated through the Kreisselmeier-Steinhauser (KS) function, and the KS function is proposed as a stiffness criterion of geometrically nonlinear structures. A topology optimization problem is defined to minimize the KS function together with the perimeter of structure and a volume constraint. The finite element analysis is done by remeshing, and artificial weak material is not used. The topology optimization problem is solved by us… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This equivalence does not extend to the non-linear regime. In fact, as reported by [30,32], the end-compliance might not be the best measure to characterise stiffness in this regime, and instead, they advocate for the minimisation of the complementary work. However, the scope of this paper is not on the suitability of the objective function in order to characterise the stiffness of the structure, but rather, on presenting a new methodology that can address the numerical difficulties in TO by means of the SIMP method, which manifest regardless of the choice of objective function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This equivalence does not extend to the non-linear regime. In fact, as reported by [30,32], the end-compliance might not be the best measure to characterise stiffness in this regime, and instead, they advocate for the minimisation of the complementary work. However, the scope of this paper is not on the suitability of the objective function in order to characterise the stiffness of the structure, but rather, on presenting a new methodology that can address the numerical difficulties in TO by means of the SIMP method, which manifest regardless of the choice of objective function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Several authors have ventured in the field of structural TO at large displacements/strains by using either polyconvex constitutive models or the Saint Venant-Kirchhoff model 4 [12,15,[24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32], where some strategies have been put forward to overcome some of the instabilities associated with intermediate density regions. For instance, the additive hyperelasticity technique presented in [33]; the combination of a polyconvex strain energy density in conjunction with an ad-hoc relaxation introduced in [27] to stabilise those excessively distorted elements of an underlying Finite Element mesh, or an original interpolation scheme for the strain energy density as proposed in [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The adjoint method performed to derive sensitivities of the objective function under nonlinear geometrically problem by the structure was optimized based on SIMP [8,9] and bi-directional evolutionary optimization (BESO) [10] methods. Xia and Shi [11] used the level set technique with Kreisselmeier-Steinhauser (KS) function to maximize stiffness for the geometrically nonlinear structure while the particle method was adopted to optimize an elastic structure with large deformation based on level set function [12]. Sequential piecewise linear programming (SPLP) was proposed for solving the geometrically nonlinear problem by including the second order of the objective function and converted into a linear problem to speed up the algorithm [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%