2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.rcim.2015.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stiffness-oriented posture optimization in robotic machining applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
73
0
7

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 207 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
73
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Xiong et al proposed a discrete search algorithm for the operation configuration of milling robot with optimal stiffness performance, and the optimization results significantly improved the trajectory accuracy [12]. Guo et al took the robot stiffness ellipsoid as the stiffness evaluation index to improve the robot stiffness by configuration optimization, and obtained accuracy of higher drilling axial and countersink depth [13]. However, these studies focus on configuration optimization for processing tasks with discrete positions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Xiong et al proposed a discrete search algorithm for the operation configuration of milling robot with optimal stiffness performance, and the optimization results significantly improved the trajectory accuracy [12]. Guo et al took the robot stiffness ellipsoid as the stiffness evaluation index to improve the robot stiffness by configuration optimization, and obtained accuracy of higher drilling axial and countersink depth [13]. However, these studies focus on configuration optimization for processing tasks with discrete positions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The configuration of the robot and the cutting force acting on it during machining are dependent upon the pose of the workpiece relative to the robot. It has been found that the natural frequencies of a robot strongly depend on its configuration [34] and that the robot stiffness varies significantly in different directions [35,36] and can be improved by optimizing the robot configuration for a given pick-and-place task [36][37][38], which implies that the vibration characteristics of robotic machining are affected by how the workpiece is placed with respect to the robot. For example, the robot stiffness is considered in Reference [37] for the optimization of the redundant degrees of freedom to minimize the displacement of the cutting tool under static force.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before the machining process, cutting tests at different spindle speeds are carried out, and the spindle speed which has the lowest RMS directional value will be implemented for robotic milling. Guo et al 14 presented an optimization method for robot postures in machining applications, which can be used to find the robot posture that has the largest stiffness at a certain tool center location. By optimizing the robot postures at different tool center locations along the machining path, the robot stiffness and the chatter stability can be improved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%