2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.rcim.2018.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stiffness performance index based posture and feed orientation optimization in robotic milling process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
37
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…However, they have not validated the method experimentally. To optimise a feed orientation, Chen et al [105] proposed a normal stiffness performance index which is derived from the comprehensive stiffness performance index, based on the relationship between external force and EE, to evaluate robot stiffness on a given posture. Cutting force and cutting vibration are sensitive factors for robotic machining.…”
Section: Machining Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, they have not validated the method experimentally. To optimise a feed orientation, Chen et al [105] proposed a normal stiffness performance index which is derived from the comprehensive stiffness performance index, based on the relationship between external force and EE, to evaluate robot stiffness on a given posture. Cutting force and cutting vibration are sensitive factors for robotic machining.…”
Section: Machining Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this end, an indirect method is used: the displacement of PZT is measured by a capacitive sensor, and then the cutting force is calculated by making use of the map between the cutting force and the displacement that is established by machining experiments. According to the methods proposed in References 29,30, a series of machining experiments is conducted and the relationship between the cutting force and the cutting depth is shown in the right figure of Figure 2, which is used to develop the force‐displacement map via the standard polynomial fitting technique, as given in the following FN=2.07991314.599122+36.526916.8154, where F N is the cutting force and is the cutting depth, that is, the displacement of PZT approximately. Note that the map between the cutting force and the cutting depth is not linear and it can be divided into three regions: for the first region of cutting forces 5, 8, and 11 mN, this might be attributed to the absence of the cutting edges of spherical crown when the indentation depth was small.…”
Section: System Identification and Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This condition, if theoretically may be always met, in practice cannot because the parameter H may only have values in accordance with the physical limits of the mechanical linear guide. Chen et al (2019) highlighted that position errors have a high sensitivity to angular position of rotation motors and angular errors. Their relation may be evaluated writing the infinitesimal variation of the positional parameters in function of the infinitesimal variation of the axes variables:…”
Section: Minimization Of the Joint Torquementioning
confidence: 99%