Stigma, gay men and biomedical prevention: the challenges and opportunities of a rapidly changing HIV prevention landscape

Abstract

Abstract. Improvements in biomedical technologies, combined with changing social attitudes to sexual minorities, provide new opportunities for HIV prevention among gay and other men who have sex with men (GMSM). The potential of these new biomedical technologies (biotechnologies) to reduce HIV transmission and the impact of HIV among GMSM will depend, in part, on the degree to which they challenge prejudicial attitudes, practices and stigma directed against gay men and people living with HIV (PLHIV). At the structural level, stigma regarding gay men and HIV can influence the scale-up of new biotechnologies and negatively affect GMSM's access to and use of these technologies. At the personal level, stigma can affect individual gay men's sense of value and confidence as they negotiate serodiscordant relationships or access services. This paper argues that maximising the benefits of new biomedical technologies depends on reducing stigma directed at sexual minorities and people living with HIV and promoting positive social changes towards and within GMSM communities. HIV research, policy and programs will need to invest in: (1) responding to structural and institutional stigma; (2) health promotion and health services that recognise and work to address the impact of stigma on GMSM's incorporation of new HIV prevention biotechnologies; (3) enhanced mobilisation and participation of GMSM and PLHIV in new approaches to HIV prevention; and (4) expanded approaches to research and evaluation in stigma reduction and its relationship with HIV prevention. The HIV response must become bolder in resourcing, designing and evaluating programs that interact with and influence stigma at multiple levels, including structural-level stigma.Additional keywords: community mobilisation, health promotion, men who have sex with men, policy, social inequality.

A Systems Thinking Approach to Understanding and Demonstrating the Role of Peer-Led Programs and Leadership in the Response to HIV and Hepatitis C: Findings From the W3 Project

“…For example, in many countries PrEP ( 10 , 11 ) and treatment as prevention (TasP) have profoundly disrupted meanings of safe sex and the way HIV stigma is resisted or reinforced. It has seen the emergence of community-initiated access schemes based on private importation and advocacy for publicly-funded access to medications ( 12 ). Uptake of the new technologies has disrupted the delineation between community services and health services and community workers and clinicians ( 13 , 14 ).…”

HIV Futures 8: Protocol for a Repeated Cross-sectional and Longitudinal Survey of People Living with HIV in Australia

“…The introduction of TasP and PrEP may also influence the manifestation of stigma. For example, TasP has the capacity to reduce the stigma associated with fear of transmission while simultaneously increasing stigma for those not taking treatment or with detectable viral loads (38). Stigma can affect mental health and well-being at the individual level (35, 39).…”

Gay Men’s Sexual Health Promotion in Virtual Space: Exploring Stakeholders’ Attitudes and Approaches to Outreach on Mobile Apps in Nova Scotia

“…ay men have experienced marginalization and discrimination based on their sexuality, behaviour, and HIV status (Smit et al 2012). Stigma has the potential to affect many areas of gay men's lives, such as their intimate relationships, social lives, physical health, and emotional health (Brown et al 2017;Chong et al 2017;Smit et al 2012). Since the HIV/AIDS epidemic during the 1980s, the health discourse surrounding HIV/AIDS has been closely associated with gay men (Andrew-Robinson 2014).…”