Stigma in Practice: Barriers to Health for Fat Women

Abstract

In this paper, we explore barriers to health for fat people. By shifting the focus from what fat people do or do not do, neoliberal principles are replaced by a focus instead on structural and institutional policies, attitudes, and practices. This includes the impact of stigma on the health treatment and health-seeking behavior of fat people. For example, we consider the role that provider anti-fat attitudes and confirmation bias play in the failure to provide evidenced-based healthcare to fat patients. This is an autoethnographic paper, which provides the opportunity to read research from the perspective of fat scholars, framed by questions such as: can fat people have health? Is health itself a state of being, a set of behaviors, a commodity, a performance; perhaps the new social contract? As a co-written autoethnographic paper, one aspect of the evidence provided is the recorded experiences of the two fat authors. This includes writing from notes, journals, compiled and repeated experiences with medical professionals, family, and the community. Framed by feminist standpoint and supported by literature drawn from Fat Studies, Public Health, Obesity Research, and other interdisciplinary fields, this is a valuable opportunity to present an extended account of fat discrimination and the impact of the stigma fat people face through the medical profession and other sectors of the community, written by fat individuals. The paper concludes by considering the health pathways available to fat people. Special attention is paid to whether Bacon and Aphramor's Health at Every Size paradigm provides a path to health for fat individuals.

Psychological gender, self-esteem, body-esteem, and the use of wellness treatments in women with excessive body weight

“…The results are consistent with other authors pointing to the stigmatizing effects of overweight and obesity, especially in the female population [12]. Women with excessive body weight not only have a lower self-esteem, but are also vulnerable to social discrimination, which may be related to intimate, social, and occupational situations [13][14][15].…”

A dirty little secret: stigma, shame and hepatitis C in the health setting

“…Turner posits that in progressively secularised societies, medicine has replaced religion as the social guardian of morality 26. Diseases involving deviance or self-infliction are rarely seen in morally neutral terms, and are increasingly characterised as burdening the state 27 28…”

Survey shows that Swedish healthcare professionals have a positive attitude towards surrogacy but the health of the child is a concern

“…Knowledge about surrogacy and its implications for the surrogate mother, the child and the family, is limited among the general population. Earlier research about other patient groups indicated that misconceptions held by the general public may cause stigmatisation and exclusion, which in turn may have a negative effect on healthcare‐seeking behaviour, for example among patients with obesity or mental health problems .…”