2018
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3169341
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stigma or Cushion? IMF Programs and Sovereign Creditworthiness

Abstract: IMF programs are often considered to carry a "stigma" that triggers adverse market reactions. We show that such a negative IMF effect disappears when accounting for endogenous selection into programs. To proxy for a country's access to financial markets, we use credit ratings and investor assessments for 100 countries from 1987 to 2013. Our first identification strategy exploits the differential effect of changes in IMF liquidity on loan allocation. We find that the IMF can "cushion" against falling creditwort… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

4
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
4
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“… Variants of our instrument have also been used to instrument International Monetary Fund loans (Lang , Gehring and Lang , Stubbs et al. ) and World Bank lending (Dreher et al.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Variants of our instrument have also been used to instrument International Monetary Fund loans (Lang , Gehring and Lang , Stubbs et al. ) and World Bank lending (Dreher et al.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, using initial or pre-determined values minimizes endogeneity concerns. 19 The idea is based on Lang (2016) and Gehring and Lang (2018), who employ such a supply-push identification approach using variation in the IMF's liquidity.…”
Section: Instrumenting Wb Aidmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other approaches used newspaper articles to measure policy uncertainty in the US (Baker et al, 2016) and forecast stock prices using the sentiment of newspaper articles relating to particular companies (Tetlock, 2007). Finally, Gehring and Lang (2018) used the tone of credit rating agency statements to evaluate the impact of IMF programs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%