2006
DOI: 10.1017/s0018246x06005334
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Still a Monstrosity? Some Reflections on Early Modern German Statehood

Abstract: The German political scientist and philosopher, Samuel von Pufendorf, described the Holy Roman Empire in 1667 as a ‘monstrosity’, because it did not fit any of the recognized definitions of a state. The issue of the Empire's statehood has been the most important consideration in its historiography in recent decades: was it a state? If so, what kind? This review addresses these questions by examining how the debate on the Empire is related to wider controversies surrounding German history, the contemporary proc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The absolute and relative decline of the river during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries does not support ideas emerging from other studies that the Empire could facilitate common action, enforce the collective will, or employ relatively efficient institutions. 66 Strong revisionist arguments have been advanced in favor of the old Reich's economic performance and, by extension, its overall structure. Applying the arguments of the new institutional economics (NIE) to the later Empire, Oliver Volckart's work has been influential over the past decade in rehabilitating scholarly perceptions of the Empire as a framework that could and did promote economic prosperity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The absolute and relative decline of the river during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries does not support ideas emerging from other studies that the Empire could facilitate common action, enforce the collective will, or employ relatively efficient institutions. 66 Strong revisionist arguments have been advanced in favor of the old Reich's economic performance and, by extension, its overall structure. Applying the arguments of the new institutional economics (NIE) to the later Empire, Oliver Volckart's work has been influential over the past decade in rehabilitating scholarly perceptions of the Empire as a framework that could and did promote economic prosperity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27 As Peter Wilson points out, 'Political philosophers, such as Samuel Pufendorf, called the Old Reich [i.e. the Holy Roman Empire] "monstrum" (an irregular state body like a monster)' (Wilson 2006). 28 On the development of social services, see Tomka (2004).…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 3 For questions concerning the status of the Holy Roman Empire as a modern state, see P. H. Wilson, 2006, esp. 566 for the problem of Aristotle.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%