Double Disillusion: The 2016 Australian Federal Election 2018
DOI: 10.22459/dd.04.2018.19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Still the Main Source: The Established Media

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Australian news media appear to be particularly powerful in their coverage of elections for several interrelated reasons (Denemark et al 2007: 107; Young 2010: 87–88, 232). First, Australia has some of the highest concentrations of media ownership in the world (Newman et al 2018: 126; Tiffen and Gittins 2004: 182–83), and the news media has increasingly become highly partisan, and competitive (Brookes 2020: 326), particularly during elections, with a more centrist position in the 2004 election (Gans and Leigh 2011) giving way to outright partisanship in most elections (Carson and McNair 2018; Young 2017: 885) leading politicians to take the power of media owners “very seriously” (Young 2010: 242). Second, many Australians make up their minds during the campaign, and these people are often most open to media influence (Young 2004: 45).…”
Section: Reporting Australian Electionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The Australian news media appear to be particularly powerful in their coverage of elections for several interrelated reasons (Denemark et al 2007: 107; Young 2010: 87–88, 232). First, Australia has some of the highest concentrations of media ownership in the world (Newman et al 2018: 126; Tiffen and Gittins 2004: 182–83), and the news media has increasingly become highly partisan, and competitive (Brookes 2020: 326), particularly during elections, with a more centrist position in the 2004 election (Gans and Leigh 2011) giving way to outright partisanship in most elections (Carson and McNair 2018; Young 2017: 885) leading politicians to take the power of media owners “very seriously” (Young 2010: 242). Second, many Australians make up their minds during the campaign, and these people are often most open to media influence (Young 2004: 45).…”
Section: Reporting Australian Electionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Australian research is scant. Surveys have reported that the audience for election night broadcasts tends to be politically interested and older (Cameron and McAllister 2016: 8; Young 2010: 35–37), while studies of reporting are largely limited to stating viewing figures (Carson and McNair 2018; Carson and Zion 2020). Orr (2015) presents a legally framed overview of Australian election night broadcasts among other countries, but Orr’s study lacks the kinds of granular analysis called for by Chadwick.…”
Section: Reporting Australian Electionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the 2016 Australian election, for instance, the media prioritized negative over positive stories, and those negative campaigns attacked opposing parties over issues including Medicare, asylum seekers, and other disputes. 64 Exposure to messages attacking opponents can lead voters to increasingly dislike their opponents and bolster partisan-based views of their opponents. 65 From the study's finding, it follows logically that exposure to a negative campaign strengthens the ALP and Coalitions supporters' prior attitude towards their opponents and increases their partisan strength, which makes it more likely for voters to support their own party.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%