Stillbirth and infant death: mental health among low-income mothers in Mumbai

Abstract

Background India has the highest number of stillbirths and the highest neonatal death rate in the world. In the context of its pronatalist society, women who experience perinatal loss often encounter significant social repercussions on top of grief. Furthermore, even when pregnancy outcomes were favorable, adverse life circumstances put some women at risk for postnatal depression. Therefore, perinatal loss and postnatal depression take a heavy toll on women’s mental health. The purpose of this study is to assess mental health among a sample of Mumbai slum-dwelling women with a history of recent childbirth, stillbirth, or infant death, who are at risk for perinatal grief, postnatal depression, or mental health sequelae. Methods We conducted a mixed method, cross-sectional study. A focus group discussion informed the development of a comprehensive survey using mainly internationally validated scales. After rigorous forward and back-translation, surveys were administered as face-to-face structured interviews due to low literacy and research naiveté among our respondents. Interviews were conducted by culturally, linguistically, gender-matched, trained research assistants. Results Of our reproductive age (N = 260) participants, 105 had experienced stillbirth, 69 had a history of infant death, and 25 had experienced both types of loss. Nearly half of the sample met criteria for postnatal depression, and 20% of these women also met criteria for perinatal grief. Anxiety and depression varied by subgroup, and was highest among women desiring an intervention. Conclusions Understanding factors contributing to women’s suffering related to reproductive challenges in this pronatalist context is critically important for women’s wellbeing.

Incidence and predictors of paternal anxiety and depression following fetal abnormalities requiring pregnancy termination: a cross-sectional study in China

“…The inconsistency in the prevalence of anxiety and depression may partly be explained by the inconsistency of measurement tools and time since stillbirth that data were collected. When using the same scale and diagnostic criteria, the results of previous studies and ours were similar [ 31 , 32 ]. Another explanation could be cultural differences, which may lead to differences in cognitive and psychological responses to TOPFA.…”

“…One explanation for this finding is that fathers with high income levels have good material security to reduce worries about the cost of treatment and rehabilitation for their wives. Additionally, they may pay more attention to mental health and be more active in seeking support to meet their psychological needs [ 31 ].…”

Exploring Mental Health during the Initial COVID-19 Lockdown in Mumbai: Serendipity for Some Women

“…The women in this study live in established slums, which are close-knit communities that, for many, provide a sense of social support [ 65 ]. However, it should be noted that at baseline women in the current sample indicated that they had low social support, which was significantly associated with HSCL in our regression analysis.…”

Factors Predicting Mental Health Among Women in Low-Income Communities of a Changing Society: A Mixed-Methods Study

“…These subscales, Wishful Thinking and Practical Coping are each constructed of seven items measuring two distinct coping styles and has previously been used in India. 30 , 31 Each subscale is summed separately with higher scores (0–21) indicating greater use of either coping style. Cronbach’s α = 0.77.…”

“…A 7-item scale measuring positive and negative religious coping (three items each), as well as one item regarding overall intrinsic religiosity, has previously been used in similar populations. 31 , 32 Higher scores indicate more use of positive or negative religious coping (possible scores of 3–12 each) and greater identification with intrinsic religiosity (possible score of 1–4). 33 Positive religious coping subscale Cronbach’s alpha = 0.89.…”