2006
DOI: 10.1375/twin.9.5.677
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stillbirths in Multiple Births: Test of Independence

Abstract: The stillbirth rate in twins is a more sensitive indicator of environmental hazards than the stillbirth rate in singletons. Medical care or other socioeconomic factors may be more influential for perinatal survival in twin than in single deliveries. Studies have indicated that stillbirths among children in a set of multiple maternities are not independent. Models were considered assuming independent outcomes within a set of multiple maternities. Analyses of the stillbirth rates confirm that the risk of stillbi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relative decrease varies between 53 and 68%, which can be compared with 64% among singletons. The rather constant relative decreases noted in Fellman and Eriksson (2006b) and Eriksson and Fellman (2006) seem to hold also for MZ twins. In Table 3 and Figure 2 we present for Sweden the ratio between the SBRs among MZ and DZ twins and the ratio between the SBRs among SS and DZ twins.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The relative decrease varies between 53 and 68%, which can be compared with 64% among singletons. The rather constant relative decreases noted in Fellman and Eriksson (2006b) and Eriksson and Fellman (2006) seem to hold also for MZ twins. In Table 3 and Figure 2 we present for Sweden the ratio between the SBRs among MZ and DZ twins and the ratio between the SBRs among SS and DZ twins.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Statistics Sweden published similar information for the period . Swedish data were also considered by Fellman and Eriksson (2006a, 2006b, 2006c and Eriksson and Fellman (2006).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations