Stillbirths: Where? When? Why? How to make the data count?

Abstract

for The Lancet's Stillbirths Series steering committee* Despite increasing attention and investment for maternal, neonatal, and child health, stillbirths remain invisible-not counted in the Millennium Development Goals, nor tracked by the UN, nor in the Global Burden of Disease metrics. At least 2·65 million stillbirths (uncertainty range 2·08 million to 3·79 million) were estimated worldwide in 2008 (≥1000 g birthweight or ≥28 weeks of gestation). 98% of stillbirths occur in low-income and middle-income countries, and numbers vary from 2·0 per 1000 total births in Finland to more than 40 per 1000 total births in Nigeria and Pakistan. Worldwide, 67% of stillbirths occur in rural families, 55% in rural sub-Saharan Africa and south Asia, where skilled birth attendance and caesarean sections are much lower than that for urban births. In total, an estimated 1·19 million (range 0·82 million to 1·97 million) intrapartum stillbirths occur yearly. Most intrapartum stillbirths are associated with obstetric emergencies, whereas antepartum stillbirths are associated with maternal infections and fetal growth restriction. National estimates of causes of stillbirths are scarce, and multiple (>35) classifi cation systems impede international comparison. Immediate data improvements are feasible through household surveys and facility audit, and improvements in vital registration, including specifi c perinatal certifi cates and revised International Classifi cation of Disease codes, are needed. A simple, programme-relevant stillbirth classifi cation that can be used with verbal autopsy would provide a basis for comparable national estimates. A new focus on all deaths around the time of birth is crucial to inform programmatic investment. Why don't stillbirths count?Stillbirths are invisible in many societies and on the worldwide policy agenda, but are very real to families who experience a death. Despite 30 years of attention to child survival interventions, 1,2 more than 20 years of attention to safe motherhood, 3,4 and increasing recent attention to survival of newborn babies, 5-7 the focus worldwide has remained on survival after livebirth. Stillbirths remain mostly ignored, not counting on policy, programme, and investment agendas, both internationally and often also at the national level. 8 The importance of neonatal deaths has risen on the worldwide policy agenda, mainly because of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) and recognition of the increasing proportion of child deaths that happen in the fi rst month of life-from 37% in 2000 7 to 41% in 2008. 9 A baby who dies just after birth counts in the MDG tracking, but a baby who dies in the third trimester or even during labour does not. Neither the MDGs nor the Global Burden of Disease metrics mention stillbirths, and stillbirth data are not routinely compiled by the UN. Even when stillbirths are recorded in surveys, the data are frequently combined with early neonatal deaths and reported as perinatal mortality, a combination that reduces visibility and might mask reporti...

Comparing performance of methods used to identify pregnant women, pregnancy outcomes, and child mortality in the Iganga-Mayuge Health and Demographic Surveillance Site, Uganda

“…Definitions of pregnancy outcomes were set according to standards used for international comparison [21]. The measures of mortality captured were stillbirth rate (SBR), neonatal mortality rate (NMR), and Infant Mortality Rate (IMR).The computation of mortality rates are shown below: …”

Pregnancy Loss and Carotid Intima–Media Thickness in Mexican Women

“…Unmeasured and residual confounding due to common causes of pregnancy loss and CVD cannot be excluded; for example, we were unable to assess endothelial dysfunction, which has been linked to pregnancy loss and adverse placental outcomes 34. In addition, socioeconomic status is a risk factor associated with CVD and pregnancy loss 5, 37. We cannot exclude the possibility of residual confounding by socioeconomic status; however, all participants have a stable job and healthcare coverage.…”

“…Most miscarriages result from chromosomal abnormalities of the embryo. In contrast, stillbirth is often rooted in limited access to adequate prenatal care 5. However, both miscarriage and stillbirth are considered to be highly stressful events that may produce lasting psychological effects such as posttraumatic stress symptoms 6, 7.…”

Mortalidad neonatal en el marco de los Objetivos de Desarrollo del Milenio y nuevos objetivos post-2015

“…6 U n a s p e c t o p o c o c o n o c i d o e s q u e 2,6 millones de muertes fetales (MF) anuales (la mitad aproximadamente durante el parto) permanecen invisibles, ya que no son incluidas en los mecanismos de seguimiento global, como el estudio de la carga global de la enfermedad, reportado rutinariamente por la Organización de las Naciones Unidas (ONU) desde registros vitales o medido rutinariamente en las Encuestas Demográficas y de Salud o en las Encuestas de Indicadores Múltiples por Conglomerados de UNICEF. 7 Si no se cuentan los mortinatos, se ignora su efecto sobre las mujeres y familias, y esto conduce a la subestimación de los beneficios de inversiones en el cuidado de la salud perinatal. En la Argentina, la reducción de la MF observada se asoció con el incremento de los nacimientos vivos prematuros.…”