2019
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz1350
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

STIM map: detection map for exoplanets imaging beyond asymptotic Gaussian residual speckle noise

Abstract: Direct imaging of exoplanets is a challenging task as it requires to reach a high contrast at very close separation to the star. Today, the main limitation in the high-contrast images is the quasi-static speckles that are created by residual instrumental aberrations. They have the same angular size as planetary companions and are often brighter, hence hindering our capability to detect exoplanets. Dedicated observation strategies and signal processing techniques are necessary to disentangle these speckles from… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
37
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
3
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also tentatively seen using PCA-ASDI, although self-subtraction of azimuthally extended structures due to angular differential imaging may account for the differences between the two images. PCA-SDI and PCA-ASDI images obtained with different pc subtracted are provided in Appendix E. We also computed a standardized trajectory intensity mean map (STIM map; Pairet et al 2019), using the residual cube after subtraction of the PCA-SDI model (as in Christiaens et al 2019a). The STIM map does not reveal the spiral feature conspicuously, as the inverse STIM map (i.e.…”
Section: Detection Of a Point Source And Tentative Spiralsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also tentatively seen using PCA-ASDI, although self-subtraction of azimuthally extended structures due to angular differential imaging may account for the differences between the two images. PCA-SDI and PCA-ASDI images obtained with different pc subtracted are provided in Appendix E. We also computed a standardized trajectory intensity mean map (STIM map; Pairet et al 2019), using the residual cube after subtraction of the PCA-SDI model (as in Christiaens et al 2019a). The STIM map does not reveal the spiral feature conspicuously, as the inverse STIM map (i.e.…”
Section: Detection Of a Point Source And Tentative Spiralsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, this covariance is not derived from the Gaussian equation together with the signal intensity, and thus the result is not guaranteed to be MLE. Pairet et al 28 (STIM map) proposed STIM map, which used a modified Rician distribution, which is a heavy tail distribution compared to Gaussian, to model the speckles. Dahlqvist et al 29 (RSM map) used a Markov process to model the same pixel throughout the different images.…”
Section: Generalized Likelihood Ratio Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unknown stands for a reference-less submission we received. STIM fullframe is the Standardized Trajectory Intensity Mean (STIM) detection map 35 computed from a fullframe PCA subtraction. STIM annuli is the STIM detection map computed from an annular PCA subtraction.…”
Section: Speckle Subtraction Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%