Proceedings of the 2002 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work - CSCW '02 2002
DOI: 10.1145/587119.587121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stimulating social engagement in a community network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
40
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While 33% of the users have not contributed content to Beehive, this is not an enormous surprise, as we expect to have a substantial lurker population as the community matures [26]. Figure 4 breaks down the user contribution levels by the different content types, to show that most users are making connections on the site and a third of the users are setting their status message.…”
Section: Overview Of Site Growth and Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While 33% of the users have not contributed content to Beehive, this is not an enormous surprise, as we expect to have a substantial lurker population as the community matures [26]. Figure 4 breaks down the user contribution levels by the different content types, to show that most users are making connections on the site and a third of the users are setting their status message.…”
Section: Overview Of Site Growth and Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e-Neighborhood [17] offered different forums for reviews of local business and services, classifieds and events. The Carlisle Community Center designers reported that some discussion topics such as politics and local issues related to danger and novelty were more appealing to the neighbors as they generated more participation in the discussion forums [21]. Based on this observation, they suggested that purposefully seeding these sorts of topics might be an effective approach to increasing participation in community networks.…”
Section: Community Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the social exchange theory (Thibaut & Kelly, 1959) and the reciprocal altruism theory (Trivers, 1971) state that people will invest only when they can expect something in return. Erickson and Kellogg (2000) as well as Millen and Patterson (2002) argue that visualising people and their actions in a network can enhance members' contribution and participation, in particular when the benefits of these actions are made visible. Ling et al (2005) found an increase in contribution in Movielens -a web-based movie recommender site-when the site would indicate to the members how unique they and their contributions were; whereas Lui et al (2002) refer to intrinsic and external motivational factors, or personal and interpersonal factors.…”
Section: Participation In Online Communitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%