2006
DOI: 10.1093/bja/aei315
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stimulation induced variability of pulse plethysmography does not discriminate responsiveness to intubation

Abstract: Tetanic stimulation induced PPG variation does not reflect the analgesic state in a wide clinical range of surgical anaesthesia.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PPG is extremely sensitive to even the slightest movement, creating unacceptably large artifacts. We specifically chose not to use neuromuscular transmission monitors, because use of neuromuscular monitors is known to induce an electrical stimulus that results in peripheral vasoconstriction, thus, interfering with our data [3, 4, 7]. Despite the 3 min time interval between administration of rocuronium and endotracheal intubation, two patients moved their arms during intubation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PPG is extremely sensitive to even the slightest movement, creating unacceptably large artifacts. We specifically chose not to use neuromuscular transmission monitors, because use of neuromuscular monitors is known to induce an electrical stimulus that results in peripheral vasoconstriction, thus, interfering with our data [3, 4, 7]. Despite the 3 min time interval between administration of rocuronium and endotracheal intubation, two patients moved their arms during intubation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the study of ANS responses to nociception, however, the main interest is to use PPG to reflect sympathetic stress responses and vasoconstriction, and therefore transmission mode PPG seems a more appropriate choice. The studies published so far have focused on measurement sites with significant vasomotor control, especially on finger PPG 5–8,15 or laser Doppler flowmeter 3,4,16 . Finger PPG has been suggested as a better location than the ear because in the finger the walls of the cutaneous vessels are richly innervated by α‐adrenoceptors and hence the sensitivity to the sympathetic system is suggested to be better 13…”
Section: Signal Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One method has been to calculate a mean value for a period [6,7,[20][21][22], the other method has been to calculate the peak value within a period [19]. In our study, tracheal intubation took different times for different patients, hence it was not suitable to calculate a mean value for an arbitrary period (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%