2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.09.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stimulation of bacteria and protists in rhizosphere of glyphosate-treated barley

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other recent studies have observed subtle or insignificant impacts of glyphosate on bacterial communities, though in a more limited number of soils or with little experimental replication (11,14,18,26). For example, Newman et al (11) described slight increases in the relative abundances of Proteobacteria and decreases in Acidobacteria, consistent with the concept of copiotrophic bacteria being favored over oligotrophs in the rhizospheres of glyphosate-treated plants (28). However, there are few investigations of how a history of glyphosate use impacts the microbial community response to additional herbicide applications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other recent studies have observed subtle or insignificant impacts of glyphosate on bacterial communities, though in a more limited number of soils or with little experimental replication (11,14,18,26). For example, Newman et al (11) described slight increases in the relative abundances of Proteobacteria and decreases in Acidobacteria, consistent with the concept of copiotrophic bacteria being favored over oligotrophs in the rhizospheres of glyphosate-treated plants (28). However, there are few investigations of how a history of glyphosate use impacts the microbial community response to additional herbicide applications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Because some taxa are glyphosate sensitive, whereas others are insensitive or may benefit from it as a nutrient source, glyphosate is likely to have negative, neutral, or positive effects on soil microbial populations and to modify the microbiomes of crop plants. Consequently, it is not surprising that studies on the effects of glyphosate on microbial populations have yielded conflicting evidence, suggesting detrimental effects (9)(10)(11)(18)(19)(20), minimal or no effects (21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27), or stimulatory effects (23,(28)(29)(30)(31) on bacterial abundance, activity, and diversity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, Imparato et al. ]) influenced by plants, but in most cases the possible existence of such mechanisms remains to be determined. The different Nebela species were strongly correlated to habitat‐type also corresponding to contrasting vascular plant and bryophyte communities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Community patterns of soil micro-organisms including testate amoebae may be directly (e.g., through facilitation or allelopathy) or indirectly (e.g., through plant-induced modification of the environment [Philippot et al 2013, Imparato et al 2016) influenced by plants, but in most cases the possible existence of such mechanisms remains to be determined. The different Nebela species were strongly correlated to habitat-type also corresponding to contrasting vascular plant and bryophyte communities.…”
Section: Environmental Gradients Vegetation and Driving Factors Of Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This also comes true for statements on side effects from herbicides, e.g. the influence of glyphosate on the composition of the microorganism flora of both the soil and of endophytic communities in the plant (Kuklinsky-Sobrel et al, 2005;Imparato et al, 2016;Newman et al, 2016). The current body of evidence does not allow one to draw clear conclusions on the direction of the effects or their impact.…”
Section: Fastidiosamentioning
confidence: 99%