2013
DOI: 10.5194/bg-10-7829-2013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stimulation of microbial nitrogen cycling in aquatic ecosystems by benthic macrofauna: mechanisms and environmental implications

Abstract: Abstract. Invertebrate animals that live at the bottom of aquatic ecosystems (i.e., benthic macrofauna) are important mediators between nutrients in the water column and microbes in the benthos. The presence of benthic macrofauna stimulates microbial nutrient dynamics through different types of animal–microbe interactions, which potentially affect the trophic status of aquatic ecosystems. This review contrasts three types of animal–microbe interactions in the benthos of aquatic ecosystems: (i) ecosystem engine… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
67
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 148 publications
(242 reference statements)
3
67
4
Order By: Relevance
“…We suggest that this process was particularly important in the direct stimulation of nitrification–denitrification as increased availability of ammonium would have stimulated nitrifiers, and increased availability of nitrate and labile organic compounds would have specifically stimulated heterotrophic denitrification. Moreover, in sediments with more active irrigation by meiobenthos transport of solutes like oxygen, ammonium and nitrate is generally increased in animal burrows2627 resulting in a microhabitat where the essential substrates for nitrifying and denitrifying bacteria are more available1215.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We suggest that this process was particularly important in the direct stimulation of nitrification–denitrification as increased availability of ammonium would have stimulated nitrifiers, and increased availability of nitrate and labile organic compounds would have specifically stimulated heterotrophic denitrification. Moreover, in sediments with more active irrigation by meiobenthos transport of solutes like oxygen, ammonium and nitrate is generally increased in animal burrows2627 resulting in a microhabitat where the essential substrates for nitrifying and denitrifying bacteria are more available1215.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Macrofaunal activity is generally known to enhance denitrification due to particle reworking and burrowing, ventilation and bioirrigation (refs 14, 15 and references therein) whereas, in some cases, it can negatively impact denitrification and enhance N recycling by means of DNRA stimulation16. Most studies dealing with the effects of fauna on benthic biogeochemistry have considered large animals because they are easy to manipulate in the laboratory and are expected to physically alter microbial pathways and process rates limited by diffusive supply or other constraints (for example, sediment aging, burial to strictly anoxic zones or exhaustion of energy-yielding electron acceptors)161718.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For mollusks, including Mytilus edulis, significant N 2 O production also proceeds in microbial biofilms growing on the shells of the animals (40). This phenomenon can also be expected for the richly sculptured shells of oysters, which have been recognized as keystone species for coastal nitrogen management (63), but to date has not been noted for N 2 O emission, which may be a disadvantage of nitrogen removal stimulated by benthic macrofauna (39,64). The current report on N 2 O emission from L. vannamei should thus inspire further research on N 2 O production directly associated with a larger variety of aquacultured and free-living animals.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may stimulate D W as compared to D N (i.e. if nitrifiers have not properly established), and underestimate denitrification efficiency due to large NH 4 + efflux, while the opposite maybe be true in the natural environment (Pelegri et al ; Stief ). IPT‐based investigations into the effect of macrofauna on randomly sampled intact sediment cores in which macrofaunal communities were assessed a posteriori are scarce.…”
Section: Environmental Challenges When Applying the Iptmentioning
confidence: 99%