1995
DOI: 10.2307/2390019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stimulative Effects of Arthropods on Endomycorrhizas of Sugar Maple in the Presence of Decaying Litter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
2
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
25
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of parallels can be drawn between the influence of grazers on saprotrophic and mycorrhizal systems: (i) spore ingestion can have positive and negative effects on spore distribution, depending on the grazer-fungus combination (Harinikumar and Bagyraj, 1994); (ii) severing of hyphae can restrict growth and nutrient translocation throughout hyphal networks (Klironomos and Kendrick, 1995); and (iii) grazing can have positive or negative effects on fungal activity (Gormsen et al, 2004) with consequences for nutrient mineralisation and primary productivity. As with saprotrophic fungi, grazing effects are density dependent.…”
Section: Comparisons With Mycorrhizal Fungimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A number of parallels can be drawn between the influence of grazers on saprotrophic and mycorrhizal systems: (i) spore ingestion can have positive and negative effects on spore distribution, depending on the grazer-fungus combination (Harinikumar and Bagyraj, 1994); (ii) severing of hyphae can restrict growth and nutrient translocation throughout hyphal networks (Klironomos and Kendrick, 1995); and (iii) grazing can have positive or negative effects on fungal activity (Gormsen et al, 2004) with consequences for nutrient mineralisation and primary productivity. As with saprotrophic fungi, grazing effects are density dependent.…”
Section: Comparisons With Mycorrhizal Fungimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When provided with a choice, invertebrates consistently prefer, and reproduce more successfully on, saprotrophic than mycorrhizal fungi (Gange, 2000). As a result, in complex, multi-species environments soil fauna commonly stimulate mycorrhizal growth by suppression of competing or inhibitory fungi (Klironomos and Kendrick, 1995). Plant pathogenic fungi are also generally preferred to mycorrhizal species, highlighting further the positive effects of grazers on plant productivity and mycorrhizal development (Lussenhop, 1992).…”
Section: Comparisons With Mycorrhizal Fungimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Macrofauna such as millipedes fragment leaf litter thereby increasing the surface area available for microbial attack and accelerating its break down (Anderson and Bignell, 1980;Cárcamo et al, 2000). Mesofauna (mites, collembolans and enchytraeid potworms) and microfauna (protozoa and nematodes) feed on bacteria and fungal mycelia (Klironomos and Kendrick, 1995) preventing fungistasis and disperse fungal inocula (Visser, 1985). They also affect species distributions in the litter (Parkinson et al, 1979;Newell, 1984) and determine root-microbial interactions that influence seedling establishment (Setälä, 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This (Finlay, 1985;Harris & Boerner, 1992) or left the additional supply of P can result in enhanced plant plant yield unaffected (Kaiser & Lussenhop, 1991; growth (Jakobsen, Joner & Larsen, 1994). The Klironomos & Kendrick, 1995). When effects of external mycelium of AM fungi constitutes an Collembola on the AM symbiosis could be demonimportant part of tbe fungal mycelium in soil covered strated, hyphal fragments of putative AM fungi were by herbaceous plants, and might serve as a potential also present in the digestive tract of the Collembola food source for mycophagous soil animals.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%