1982
DOI: 10.1016/0301-0511(82)90017-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stimulus deviance and evoked potentials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
157
1

Year Published

1987
1987
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 539 publications
(164 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
6
157
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, in their recent study, Mueller, Friederici, and Mannel (2012) divide infants by the polarity of their mismatch response and as a result of matching the electrophysiological responses to behavioral results, argue that the positive MMR is a correlate of immature stimulus comparison. In an early study Näätänen, Simpson, and Loveless (1982) called the slightly differing deviants as 'proximates.' They got a more prolonged MMN to this kind of stimuli, which they attributed to subjective uncertainty.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, in their recent study, Mueller, Friederici, and Mannel (2012) divide infants by the polarity of their mismatch response and as a result of matching the electrophysiological responses to behavioral results, argue that the positive MMR is a correlate of immature stimulus comparison. In an early study Näätänen, Simpson, and Loveless (1982) called the slightly differing deviants as 'proximates.' They got a more prolonged MMN to this kind of stimuli, which they attributed to subjective uncertainty.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MMN is a frontocentral negative component, usually peaking at 100-250 ms from the deviation in the stimuli, which is elicited when a novel stimulus interrupts the repeated presentation of the same stimulus. This component is sensitive to changes not only in the acoustic characteristics of auditory stimuli (Näätänen, Simpson, & Loveless, 1982), but also to their phonological properties (for a review, Pulvermüller & Shtyrov, 2006). For example, Näätänen and collaborators (Näätänen et al, 1997) demonstrated MMN responses to phoneme changes when Finnish listeners heard the Finnish vowel /ö/ or the unknown Estonian vowel /õ/ in a list composed predominantly of the Finnish vowel /e/.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This pre-attentive process compares an incoming stimulus with stimuli stored in the auditory sensory memory. It automatically sends an interrupt to the central processing channel whenever an auditory stimulus is either not represented in the auditory memory system or has a label "significant" (in the case the individual has to react on the stimulus) (Öhman 1979;Näätänen 1979). In schizophrenic patients, MMN is reduced as compared to healthy controls (Oades et al 1997;Javitt et al 1993Javitt et al , 1995Shelley et al 1991).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%