2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.09.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

STING in tumor and host cells cooperatively work for NK cell-mediated tumor growth retardation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
60
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, differential expression of STING in cancer cells and stromal support cells, as well as differential levels of immune suppression suggest that STING agonist effects are likely variable and tumor-dependent. For instance, deletion of STING in B16D8 melanoma cells has been demonstrated to have minimal impact on cell survival [70], and administration of STING agonists did not affect cell growth of B16F10, SCCFVII, or CT26 cells [71,72]. In contrast, breast cancer cell lines 4 T1, MCF-7, and T47D appear sensitive to changes in STING expression or administration of STING agonists [73,74].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, differential expression of STING in cancer cells and stromal support cells, as well as differential levels of immune suppression suggest that STING agonist effects are likely variable and tumor-dependent. For instance, deletion of STING in B16D8 melanoma cells has been demonstrated to have minimal impact on cell survival [70], and administration of STING agonists did not affect cell growth of B16F10, SCCFVII, or CT26 cells [71,72]. In contrast, breast cancer cell lines 4 T1, MCF-7, and T47D appear sensitive to changes in STING expression or administration of STING agonists [73,74].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intratumoral administration of STING agonists also potently primed tumor antigen–specific CD8 T cell responses and enhanced the anti-tumor effect of PD-L1 and OX-40 targeted therapy [31]. Additionally, STING in tumor and host immune cells cooperatively work for NK cell-mediated tumor growth retardation [32]. Clinical treatment efficacy of cetuximab is limited to 15%-20% of patients and the underlying mechanism of action suggest a link to NK cell mediated cytotoxicity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ticam‐1 −/− and Mavs −/− mice were generated in our laboratory . STING‐deficient ( Tmem173 −/− ) mice were developed in our laboratory by CRISPR/Cas9 method as previously reported . Mice 6‐14 weeks old were used and maintained under specific pathogen‐free conditions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%