2009
DOI: 10.1002/wea.397
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sting jets in severe northern European wind storms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
65
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
5
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5a,b). At both 1800 UTC 7 December and 0000 UTC 8 December, the strongest winds associated with the sting jet were adjacent to and below the near-saturated area in the model, displaying a relationship consistent with previous studies (Browning 2004;Clark et al 2005;Parton et al 2009;Baker 2009;Gray et al 2011). …”
supporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…5a,b). At both 1800 UTC 7 December and 0000 UTC 8 December, the strongest winds associated with the sting jet were adjacent to and below the near-saturated area in the model, displaying a relationship consistent with previous studies (Browning 2004;Clark et al 2005;Parton et al 2009;Baker 2009;Gray et al 2011). …”
supporting
confidence: 89%
“…The cold conveyor belt is a near-surface airstream of cold air underneath the warm-frontal zone (Carlson 1980;Schultz 2001). Strong winds in cold conveyor belts may or may not be present in addition to sting jets (e.g., Clark et al 2005;Baker 2009;Gray et al 2011;Baker et al 2013a;Smart and Browning 2013). The physical processes that lead to strong winds in the sting jet versus those that lead to strong winds in the cold conveyor belt have not been elucidated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Kyrill, see Fink et al, 2009), and double frontal structures (e.g. Erwin, see Baker, 2009). On the latter point, a recent study by Mulqueen and Schultz (2015) suggests that multiple frontal structures are commonplace for deep cyclones, at least on manually produced Met Office synoptic charts.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In discussing storm Erwin, Baker (2009) suggests that the SJ for that case was weaker than the CJ, based mainly on model simulation figures shown for 850 hPa at a particular time. However, if imagery is compared with surface observations over time during the passage of Erwin, two pulses of very strong gusts can be detected.…”
Section: Isobaric Patternmentioning
confidence: 99%