2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.microc.2019.04.056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stir bar sorptive extraction kit for determination of pesticides in water samples with chemometric data processing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As represented in Figure S4, it is evident that, AgNPs/N6-based stir bars can be reused for extraction of OPPs from aqueous sample for more than 20 times, without any significant decrease in the extraction efficiency. Also, it is evident that the prepared stir bars are chemically and mechanically stable during more than 20 times extractions, which is more stable than other reported stir bars [34].…”
Section: Lifetime and Reproducibility Of The Prepared Stir Barsmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As represented in Figure S4, it is evident that, AgNPs/N6-based stir bars can be reused for extraction of OPPs from aqueous sample for more than 20 times, without any significant decrease in the extraction efficiency. Also, it is evident that the prepared stir bars are chemically and mechanically stable during more than 20 times extractions, which is more stable than other reported stir bars [34].…”
Section: Lifetime and Reproducibility Of The Prepared Stir Barsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…The developed SBSE-GC-MS method for the measurement of some OPP compounds was compared with other methods reported in literature and the figure of merit for various methods [34][35][36][37][38][39] are represented in Table 2. Accordingly, the developed method provides lower LODs compared to some researches [35,[37][38][39] and wider LDR in comparison with some cases [36,37,39] and comparable LOD and LDR in comparison with the rest of researches.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Developed Methods With The Other Reported Researchesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Te current methods have introduced improvements to avoid the high consumption of solvents and long extraction steps. Several alternatives include matrix solid-phase dispersion (MSPD) [16]; dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction based on solidifcation of foating organic drop (DLLME-SFO) [17,18]; liquid-phase microextraction (LPME) [19]; microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) [20]; the quick, easy, cheap, efective, rugged, and safe (QuEChERS) method [21]; supercritical fuid extraction (SFE) [22]; solid-phase extraction (SPE) [23]; solidphase microextraction (SPME) [24,25]; and stir bar sorptive extraction (SBSE) [26]. Notably, extraction technique selection depends on the characteristics of the pesticide, the matrix, and the system availability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%