1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1520-667x(1999)11:10<737::aid-mcs7>3.0.co;2-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stir bar sorptive extraction (SBSE), a novel extraction technique for aqueous samples: Theory and principles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

11
581
0
34

Year Published

2000
2000
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,379 publications
(626 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
11
581
0
34
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of these techniques have several disadvantages, including extensive equipment requirements, significant quantities of expensive and environmentally unfriendly solvents, multiple handling steps that increase error, and a need for concentration of the target analytes to achieve detectable levels. Nowadays, they are easier and more selective alternatives to these classical methods, which may overcome their disadvantages, such as solid-phase microextraction (SPME), developed by Lord and Pawliszyn [15,16] and more recently stir bar sorptive extraction (SBSE) developed in the late 1990s by Baltussen et al [17]. This technique uses a Twister TM , a glass stir bar onto which is bonded a sorptive phase, often polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), in quantities far in excess of those found on SPME fibres [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these techniques have several disadvantages, including extensive equipment requirements, significant quantities of expensive and environmentally unfriendly solvents, multiple handling steps that increase error, and a need for concentration of the target analytes to achieve detectable levels. Nowadays, they are easier and more selective alternatives to these classical methods, which may overcome their disadvantages, such as solid-phase microextraction (SPME), developed by Lord and Pawliszyn [15,16] and more recently stir bar sorptive extraction (SBSE) developed in the late 1990s by Baltussen et al [17]. This technique uses a Twister TM , a glass stir bar onto which is bonded a sorptive phase, often polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), in quantities far in excess of those found on SPME fibres [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each procedure of the sample preparation is subject to inconveniences, but offers specific advantages under determined circumstances. Nowadays, alternative to these classical methods that may overcome their disadvantages, more easier and selective, are used such as solidphase microextraction (SPME), developed by Pawliszyn and coworker [14,15] in the early 1990s and more recently stir bar sorptive extraction (SBSE) developed in the late 1990s by Baltussen et al [16]. This technique uses a TwisterTM, a glass stir bar onto which is bonded a sorptive phase, often polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), in quantities far in excess of those found on SPME fibres [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Isolation of volatile compounds from this working solution was performed by the Stir Bar Sorptive Extraction (SBSE) technique (Baltussen et al 1999) according to the conditions described in detail elsewhere [19]. Also the conditions of the GC-MS analysis were as described in that paper, except for the analytical capillary GC column, that was a DB-1 (Agilent Technologies Inc.) column (30 m×0.25 mm i.d., 0.25 μm film thickness), the split injection (solvent vent mode, and purge flow to split vent at 50 mL min −1 after 0.01 min) and the Pre-processing and processing stored cubes temperature program (from 40°C (2 min) to 150°C at 4°C min −1 and then to 290°C (5 min) at 15°C min −1 ).…”
Section: Organic Acid and Carotenoid Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%