2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10681-018-2314-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

STMS (sequence tagged microsatellite site) molecular markers as a valuable tool to confirm controlled crosses in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) breeding programs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ochatt et al [82] confirmed the hybrids of interspecific crosses obtained from P. sativum × P. fulvum by molecular markers. Caballo et al [21] reliably tested the confirmation of F 1 hybrids with sequence-tagged microsatellite site (STMS) markers in intraspecific crosses of chickpea (C. arietinum L.). Morais et al [83] utilized SSR to evaluate the efficacy of controlled crossings in common bean.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ochatt et al [82] confirmed the hybrids of interspecific crosses obtained from P. sativum × P. fulvum by molecular markers. Caballo et al [21] reliably tested the confirmation of F 1 hybrids with sequence-tagged microsatellite site (STMS) markers in intraspecific crosses of chickpea (C. arietinum L.). Morais et al [83] utilized SSR to evaluate the efficacy of controlled crossings in common bean.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differentiation of true hybrid and non-hybrid F 1 plants based on morphological traits may be impossible due to the similar morphological traits, especially in interspecific crosses, e.g., most of the morphological traits of the wild tall pea (P. elatius) are similar to field pea, P. arvense [1]. If there are no adequate dominant morphological traits among parents, the use of molecular markers is a fast and reliable option in food legumes [19][20][21] for the elimination of non-hybrid F 1 plants [21]. Using molecular markers to distinguish the true hybrid plants among the F 1 progeny requires knowledge, specific lab equipment for molecular techniques, time, and low costs per sample.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Morphological characters are not always suitable to validate the hybrid nature of plants obtained from crosses carried out in the plant breeding programs. Nowadays, molecular markers are commonly used to assess the hybrid nature of cross derived plants (Pereira et al, 2016;Caballo et al, 2018). In asparagus, Valente et al (2009) reported the use of RAPD markers in the assessment of genomic introgression of A. acutifolius and A. maritimus into .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It provides inaccurate progenies that can adversely affect all stages of future breeding programs. These problems can be overcome with molecular marker assistance (Caballo et al, 2018;Chauhan et al, 2021). By analyzing the allelic profile of the parents, molecular markers quickly and accurately identify self-fertilized progenies, distinguishing them from hybrid progenies (Conceição et al, 2011;Stetter et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%