2019
DOI: 10.1177/1094428118825300
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stochastic Actor-Oriented Models for the Co-Evolution of Networks and Behavior: An Introduction and Tutorial

Abstract: Stochastic actor-oriented (SAO) models are a family of models for network dynamics that enable researchers to test multiple, often competing explanations for network change and estimate the extent and relative power of various influences on network evolution. SAO models for the co-evolution of network ties and actor behavior, the most comprehensive category of SAO models, examine how networks and actor attributes—their behavior, performance, or attitudes—influence each other over time. While these models have … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The field of network science is progressing at an incredibly fast pace, with many of the new developments focused on multilevel and temporal factors (Lazega & Snijders, 2016). There are currently techniques that allow for examining the multilevel and temporal factors involved with dyadic ties in networks (e.g., Krivitsky & Handcock, 2014) and changes to network structure (e.g., Kalish, 2020; Snijders, Lomi, & Torló, 2013; Snijders & Steglich, 2015), identifying communities (e.g., Fortunato & Hric, 2016) and important influencers (e.g., Lü et al, 2016) in networks, considering networks involving multimode (i.e., human and nonhuman factors) nodes (Contractor, Monge, & Leonardi, 2011), and a wide variety of other methodological approaches and tools. As is apparent from the above discussion of future research needs associated with bottom-up effects and processes, these and other network methodological developments have great potential to shed light on a number of important multilevel research questions and address remaining method-oriented challenges.…”
Section: The Futurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The field of network science is progressing at an incredibly fast pace, with many of the new developments focused on multilevel and temporal factors (Lazega & Snijders, 2016). There are currently techniques that allow for examining the multilevel and temporal factors involved with dyadic ties in networks (e.g., Krivitsky & Handcock, 2014) and changes to network structure (e.g., Kalish, 2020; Snijders, Lomi, & Torló, 2013; Snijders & Steglich, 2015), identifying communities (e.g., Fortunato & Hric, 2016) and important influencers (e.g., Lü et al, 2016) in networks, considering networks involving multimode (i.e., human and nonhuman factors) nodes (Contractor, Monge, & Leonardi, 2011), and a wide variety of other methodological approaches and tools. As is apparent from the above discussion of future research needs associated with bottom-up effects and processes, these and other network methodological developments have great potential to shed light on a number of important multilevel research questions and address remaining method-oriented challenges.…”
Section: The Futurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…REM departs from a typical assumption of other network statistical frameworks, such as ERGMs or SAOMs, for which the issue of dependence between observations is critical (Kalish, 2020;Lusher et al, 2013). In REM, each event is considered to be conditionally independent of all other events in the sequence.…”
Section: The Relational Event Modelmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Finally, researchers may adopt stochastic actor‐oriented (SAO) models to test ideas regarding how coworker DoM and EoM cues impact employee DoM and EoM evaluations (see Kalish, 2020). SAO models allow researchers to examine whether coworkers (alters) and an employee (ego) develop similar levels of DoM (e.g., job satisfaction) and EoM (e.g., job search behavior) over time (i.e., the covariate‐similarity effect), which would provide evidence of contagion.…”
Section: Implications For Multilevel Theorizingmentioning
confidence: 99%