2016 IEEE 55th Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/cdc.2016.7799327
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stochastic behavior of robots that navigate by interacting with their environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We utilize a low-level switching controller to ensure that the robot follows the trajectory and reaches the desired waypoint. At each instance when the sliding local map is updated, the controller switches between the following strategies: free-space, boundary following [29], [33], and flow-through [27] as described in Algorithm 3. From the switching strategy, the robot will determine whether the Bspline trajectory is suitable or it needs to generate a new reference trajectory as illustrated in Fig.…”
Section: B Maneuver Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We utilize a low-level switching controller to ensure that the robot follows the trajectory and reaches the desired waypoint. At each instance when the sliding local map is updated, the controller switches between the following strategies: free-space, boundary following [29], [33], and flow-through [27] as described in Algorithm 3. From the switching strategy, the robot will determine whether the Bspline trajectory is suitable or it needs to generate a new reference trajectory as illustrated in Fig.…”
Section: B Maneuver Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physical interaction between a robot and its environment has been demonstrated to be potentially advantageous for mission completion ( Karydis et al, 2014 ; Stager and Tanner, 2020 ; Stager and Tanner, 2016 ; Stager and Tanner, 2019 ). In addition, some types of physical interaction between robots can significantly change the dynamics of the agents involved (e.g., when an aerial robot lifts a wheeled robot, the aerial robot’s inertial characteristics change and contact constraints for the ground robot are now lifted) ( Mellinger et al, 2011 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• We extend the DRR strategy to generate local trajectories when colliding with (non-)convex obstacles. The first iteration of the robot, inspired by the omnipuck robot [19], featured a passive collision ring and a singleboard computer for motion control [1], [2]. This iteration has a radius of 0.12 m and weighs 0.6 kg.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig.1: The evolution of our omni-directional holonomic robot prototypes used in our collision-inclusive motion planning and control research program. (a) The first iteration of the robot, inspired by the omnipuck robot[19], featured a passive collision ring and a singleboard computer for motion control[1],[2]. This iteration has a radius of 0.12 m and weighs 0.6 kg.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%