2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11134-016-9486-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stochastic bounds in Fork–Join queueing systems under full and partial mapping

Abstract: In a Fork-Join (FJ) queueing system an upstream fork station splits incoming jobs into N tasks to be further processed by N parallel servers, each with its own queue; the response time of one job is determined, at a downstream join station, by the maximum of the corresponding tasks' response times. This queueing system is useful to the modelling of multi-service systems subject to synchronization constraints, such as MapReduce clusters or multipath routing. Despite their apparent simplicity, FJ systems are har… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
52
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
5
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Corollary 1.1 demonstrates that, with fixed µ(θ) and ψ(θ), the upper bound for the violation probability P (W (t) ≥ w) grows with increasing m. The observation coincides with the result mentioned in [16] and [17] that the delay roughly scales up linearly with the number of independent paths, especially when the end-to-end delay on each path is small.…”
Section: A Delay Bound For Traffic Dispersionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Corollary 1.1 demonstrates that, with fixed µ(θ) and ψ(θ), the upper bound for the violation probability P (W (t) ≥ w) grows with increasing m. The observation coincides with the result mentioned in [16] and [17] that the delay roughly scales up linearly with the number of independent paths, especially when the end-to-end delay on each path is small.…”
Section: A Delay Bound For Traffic Dispersionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Clearly, both the traffic dispersion and network densification schemes are promising and competitive candidates for lowlatency mm-wave communications. Though there are many research contributions in low-latency communications based on above two principles, the existing literature focus on either the dispersion scheme (e.g., [12]- [17]) or multi-hop relaying scheme (e.g., [18]- [21]). It is not clear yet which scheme can provide better delay performance.…”
Section: B Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section we discuss prior work on the limited fork-join model and some other related models. Prior work on the limited forkjoin model [19,28] has focused on the non-asymptotic regime and derived bounds on job delay. However, the bounds in [19,28] do not have tightness guarantees.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, exact results are known only for few specific systems, such as two parallel M|M|1 queues [7], [8]. For more complex systems, approximation techniques, e.g., [5], [8]- [14], and bounds, using stochastic orderings [4], martingales [15], or stochastic burstiness constraints [16], have been explored. Given the difficulties posed by single-stage fork-join systems, few works consider This work was supported in part by the European Research Council (ERC) under Starting Grant UnIQue (StG 306644).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A notable exception is [13] where an approximation for closed fork-join networks is developed. Related synchronization problems also occur in the case of load balancing using parallel servers and in the case of multi-path routing of packet data streams [17] using multipath protocols [15]. The tail behavior of delays in multi-path routing is investigated in [17] as well as in [18], [19] where large deviation results of resequencing delays for parallel M|M|1 queues are derived.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%