2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmva.2015.09.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stochastic dominance and statistical preference for random variables coupled by an Archimedean copula or by the Fr e ´ chet–Hoeffding upper bound

Abstract: Please cite this article as: I. Montes, S. Montes, Stochastic dominance and statistical preference for random variables coupled by an Archimedean copula or by the Fréchet-Hoeffding upper bound, Journal of Multivariate Analysis (2015), http://dx. AbstractStochastic dominance and statistical preference are stochastic orders with different interpretations: the former is based on the comparison of the marginal distributions while the latter is based on the joint distribution. Sklar's Theorem allows expressing the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this vein, some of the present authors have proved that statistical preference is closer to another location parameter, namely the median [11]. We have also proved that, under common conditions such as independence, (first degree) stochastic dominance implies statistical preference [12,13,14,15], and that both concepts are equivalent in some particular situations, such as when comparing normally distributed random variables with the same variance [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this vein, some of the present authors have proved that statistical preference is closer to another location parameter, namely the median [11]. We have also proved that, under common conditions such as independence, (first degree) stochastic dominance implies statistical preference [12,13,14,15], and that both concepts are equivalent in some particular situations, such as when comparing normally distributed random variables with the same variance [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Therefore, as we did in [14] for statistical preference, we aim to extend the connection between first degree stochastic dominance and probabilistic preference given in Theorem 17 for some prominent dependence models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, it was even suggested in [7] to call it (at least at some instances) the stress-strength order, which naturally compares two random variables as in structural reliability. For recent advances, see [12] and [15]. Further, to avoid any confusion caused by the different definitions of the stochastic precedence order (see [3]), and as we are considering lifetimes of engineering items, we assume that the corresponding distribution functions are absolutely continuous.…”
Section: Two Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in a suitable stochastic sense. For all mentioned basic stochastic orders (1.1) is transitive meaning that T i ≤ T j , for all 1 ≤ i < j ≤ n. We now define the stochastic precedence (SP) order (see, e.g., Boland et al [4], Finkelstein [5], Montes and Montes [8], to name a few). Definition 1.2 Let T 1 and T 2 be two nonnegative independent random variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We now define the stochastic precedence (SP) order that was not so extensively studied and applied as the foregoing orders (see [1,4,[7][8][9]12]). Definition 1.2: Let T 1 and T 2 be two independent random variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%